italia44
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2006
- Messages
- 3,285
- Reaction score
- 0
yet. hahahaha you like that? quoted myself.
again......you're bringing a knife to an intellectual gunfight.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.yet. hahahaha you like that? quoted myself.
again......you're bringing a knife to an intellectual gunfight.
This has all gone a bit childish hasn't it guys? Get back to the topic at hand and save the tirades for pm's would you
P.S Bodden for President of the World.
again......you're bringing a knife to an intellectual gunfight.
dude i called you a loser - please read the above HAHAHAHAHA
loser.
HAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!! Muahahahahaa! Haa..haaa.haaaaaa.
Seriously man? Someone lock this thread.
maybe you, since no one else can, tell me how bodden is a #1 cb
Bodden and Springs had a great game yesterday.. THey were hip to hip on almost every play.. Big difference from last year..
Someone with more time than me should figure out the ypc last year compared to this year.. I would think there would be a noticeable difference..
But theyre not getting theyre hands on balls or getting into position to create turnovers
We're one of only 4 teams in the league without an INT - and one of the others plays game #3 tonight. It's a concern, especially as we haven't had any "almost" INTs but we played well against a good passing team so it's good enough for now. To win the SB, though, we need some more turnovers.But theyre not getting theyre hands on balls or getting into position to create turnovers
True but still there playing better than the guys that we had last year.. I would tend to think they will only get better as they get familar with the defense..
O i was well aware of that stat my man.We're one of only 4 teams in the league without an INT - and one of the others plays game #3 tonight. It's a concern, especially as we haven't had any "almost" INTs but we played well against a good passing team so it's good enough for now. To win the SB, though, we need some more turnovers.
I dont know.
I mean the zone schemes we're throwing out there arnt enough. These guys are protecting WR's for what seems like 10 seconds at times and thats light years for a good QB. Our pressure has been god awful i'd like to see that improve and create more turnovers
I think we're all wondering where the heck Burgess is. Banta Cain has helped on the pass rush as times but Burgess has been the invisible man for two games now.but like my post below the pass rush is so inconsistently ineffefective that it hurts our coverage. If you give any decent WR time they will make seperation and get open.
I think we're all wondering where the heck Burgess is. Banta Cain has helped on the pass rush as times but Burgess has been the invisible man for two games now.
If going into the season someone said our biggest pass rusher was TBC i would have said we're in serious trouble. He's been better then what i would have expected from him from his last stint with us but its ridiculous to just rely on him.
Maybe Belichick really wants the Peppers type of player but just was unable to come across one for a fair price
It's hard enough to find a "Peppers type of player", much less find on at a "fair price".
TBC has been much better than I expected. But we need more than TBC for a pass rush. Get some pressure and the INTs will come.