*cough* Just a tickle in my throat
*cough*
Google News and a slightly obsessive-compulsive mind is a
powerful thing.
On another note, just a real
kudos and
thanks to you Chris. One thing that I really enjoy about your blog and transcripts is the fact that you don't truncate the reporter's questions. I never realized it before you came along, but it makes a world of difference.
For example:
....from one of our
other favorite guys...
Yet from your blog we learn the question is actually much different....
Obviously to anyone with a clear mind
(of which I'm not often accused) can see how the questioner was
specifically trying to lead Seymour to an answer that fit his view. (That wasn't still Felger, was it? Was it Curran?)
Anyway, I'm not criticizing anybody else or screaming media conspiracy or anything silly. I understand why it's common practice to condense the wandering babble of a reporter, but I really appreciate the difference being able to see the actual question in full. And in this case, it really makes the answer even better from Seymour, because you can see him avoid the obvious baiting that was going on with the question.
Thanks again.