K-Ro 25
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2008
- Messages
- 669
- Reaction score
- 0
After 3 years of Eric Mangini, you still dont understand a 2gap defense?
Colemans job isnt to get push. His job is to engage the blocker.
Bartons job is not to get tackles for loss, his job is to stay home at the los and take on the G. Barton IIRC had 90 tackles last year and Bart Scott had 60. I dont put a lot of stock in tackle stats, but thats what they were IIRC.
I just cant believe we are arguing that JAG Leonhard was a DIFFERENCE MAKER in Bmores defense. That is bizarre to me.
When oyu have to defend the player by saying he knows the system all talk of upgrade should cease.
So to get this straight you think there is a significant difference between Leonhard and Elam and that change alone makes the Jets a better defensive team? Just want to have tha answer so I can understand the rules for when we discuss the Patriots and what claims I can make without anything more than hope.
I understand the point of the 3-4 2 gap. But when you cant draw doubles and constantly get pushed backwards by 1 linemen consistently, I think that constitutes a scrub. The above description is Kenyon Coleman.
Bart Scot vs Eric Barton. I honestly dont know what to say anymore. How are they comparable.
Elam vs Leonhard is a slight upgrade.
The Jets will be better on D this year b/c of two main reasons really.
a) I hate Mangini and his vanilla schemes and feel Rex will bring something new to the table that players actually thrive off using their strengths instead of being forced into a my way or the highway D which Mangina was known for.
b) we upgraded or stayed the same at every position on D (the biggest one being Bart Scott not Jim leonhard, Scott is 10x the player Eric Barton is. You watch stats while I watch the two play and its obvious who is better, wheres the stat for having a LB who can cover the TE?)
I dont see them as a top ten D jus a good D