Welcome to PatsFans.com

Best Backfields in the NFL

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Bostonian1962, May 27, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bostonian1962

    Bostonian1962 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,045
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

  2. nashvillepatsfan

    nashvillepatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    3,213
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    I would take Pitt, and Atlanta before i would take the giants. #2? ya kiddin me? Jacobs is good when healthy, and nobody will ever convince me that little Manning is any good. Having a SB ring does not mean you're suddenly a good QB.
  3. ausbacker

    ausbacker Brady > Manning. PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,262
    Likes Received:
    126
    Ratings:
    +333 / 5 / -2

    #51 Jersey

    Trent Dilfer school of Quarterbacking?
  4. NEGoldenAge

    NEGoldenAge Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,025
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Any analysis of the Pat's backfield that does not include Faulk, is worthless.
  5. WhiZa

    WhiZa Rookie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    5,043
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I agree, having the manning name and being a #1 pick puts this guy on a pedestal, but without his 2 best receivers he won't be the same anymore. The criticism will run rampant this year in NY.
  6. Liverpool_Patriot

    Liverpool_Patriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2009
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I would rate Sammy Morris higher than Maroney
  7. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,307
    Likes Received:
    130
    Ratings:
    +241 / 8 / -26

    As much as I hate to admit it, Indy at #10 seems low.. the top 4 or 5 are pretty much interchangeable.. Rivers/Tomlinson/Sproles is pretty much equal to Brady/Maroney/Taylor/Morris/FAULK..
    Last edited: May 27, 2009
  8. sieglo

    sieglo Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,243
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    What an idiotic ranking.

    I can't think of one single NFL backfield that I would take over Brady / Maroney / Taylor / Faulk / Morris.

    For the simple reason that it is Tom Fvcking Brady we're talking about.
  9. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,555
    Likes Received:
    153
    Ratings:
    +322 / 5 / -5

    :yeahthat:
  10. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    Yeah, how is Cutler/Forte better than Peyton/Addai?

    Who would you rather face in a must-win week 17 game?
  11. State

    State Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,516
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    #70 Jersey

    Dallas ahead of NE and Philly? That's crazy. And Indy now with Donald Brown, the Patrick Chung of RBs, is way too low.
  12. AzPatsFan

    AzPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    6,145
    Likes Received:
    94
    Ratings:
    +216 / 19 / -10

    In most comparisons of backfields, they include the flanker, who is really considered to be the other halfback. That changes things a mite. Rivers, LT and Vincent? Chuckle, Chuckle.

    Manning, Jacobs ,and ??? More Chuckles.


    Brady, Taylor/Maroney/Faulk, and Moss/Galloway. Near GOATish... :eek:
  13. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0


    Everyone comes from somewhere. As do their perceptions. Given some of his bizarre analysis and inconsistent methidology (not to mention difficulty counting/tracking rostered backfields and simply mis spelling recently well known names (CasseLL and Josh DANIELS for example) I googled him. Mullin has been a Bears beat reporter for a long time...

    Although he has admitted in the past that the 53rd player on their roster knows more about football than he ever will. So at least he's honest.
  14. CT_PatsFan

    CT_PatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Indeed! Faulk was a beast last year. Also I wouldn't rank the Giants that high. They're good, but not THAT good.
  15. xmarkd400x

    xmarkd400x Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,746
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    This ranking is just retarded.

    Would you rather have: Brady + average offense, or the Chargers (Rivers, LdT, Sproles, etc)?

    Let's see.... Brady has done more with average players than the Chargers have ever done. 2001 Super Bowl? Remember the Chargers losing to a Patriots team with (I think) Reche Caldwell as their lead receiver?

    The fact of the matter is that Brady is just so much better than anyone (except Peyton) that you can't compensate for a worse QB with a better RB. Brady is so good that Brady (or P. Manning) + Average Talent is better than any other QB with the best talent in the league.
    Last edited: May 27, 2009
  16. Synovia

    Synovia Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I'm not big on manning, but pittsburgh's running game is terrible.
  17. Synovia

    Synovia Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I don't remember the 2005-6 offense being all that good.


    Since when is Randy Moss and Wes Welker "average talent".Randy may be the best who has ever played the position.
  18. furley

    furley Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think Pittsburgh, Indianapolis and Carolina could be ranked higher if everyone's healthy. The wild card is Arizona. But, then I thought this ranking was for just each team's running back depth.
  19. stcjones

    stcjones Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,688
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +19 / 8 / -1

    #12 Jersey


    I agree with you on Gomer Manning.......If it wasn't for the hail mary facemask catch and a ref choking on his whistle while Thomas, Warren, and Seymour had him firmly in the grasp while all three were being HELD by Gint O-lineman.........He'd still be talked about as a failure..........
  20. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I don't understand this person's analysis. He's ranking "backfields" yet in his Chargers analysis he adds that Shawne Merriman is the biggest addition of all? What does Shawne Merriman have to do with their backfield? I understand that a better defense means more opportunities for an offense. However, that is called a "team". The guy needs to stick with "backfields" and not focus on what a team has around them. With that said, how in the hell is San Diego rated #1? Rivers gets most of his stats when the game is already over (won or lost) and LT is on his last leg. In fact, I think that guy is done. However, Sproles is a fantastic compliment. If he is including QB's with RB's, it's a no brainer you take Brady even with his recent injury. Pretty lame article if you ask me.

    If you're actually rating "backfields" (excluding QB's), my top 5 rankings would be:

    1. Carolina - Williams had a breakout year and Jonathon Stewart showed he can be a lead back for any team. In fact, Stewart almost had 1,000 rushing with 10 Td's. As of right now, they are easily the best tandem in the NFL.

    2. New England - I didn't rank them #1 so I don't sound like a homer but Taylor, Morris, Faulk, Maroney are probably the best quartet in the NFL. Taylor and Morris can pound it, Faulk will make clutch play after clutch play and Maroney can break the big one. The Pats pretty much have it all.

    3. Dallas - Barber, Jones and Choice look like a nice trio for years to come. Barber can pound it, Jones can break the big one at any time and Choice does a little bit of everything.

    4. Atlanta - The number don't lie, they can pound the rock with Turner and Norwood. In fact, Norwood should see more carries this season to because of his explosiveness and so the Falcons don't run Turner into the ground by the playoffs.

    5. Giants - Would have been ranked #1 had the Giants kept Ward. The only team last year to have 2 1,000 yard rushers. However, they still have Bradshaw who can give you big plays.
    Last edited: May 27, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>