tanked_as_usual
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,981
- Reaction score
- 0
The Colts for comparison purposes have 35 drafted players average round of selection is 3.8. They have 8 players selected in the 1st round, 14 players selected in round 4 or later. They have 17 UDFAs and 15 FA and 1 UFA (a kicker we may know).
The Pats have 31 drafted players, average pick is 105 (mid 3rd). 7 1st round players, 9 Players drafted in round 4 or later, 15 UDFA, 4 UFA, 14 FA and 3 players from trades.
The Colts are generally held up as a great drafting team and you say you would rather have their roster than the Pats. The numbers show that the Pats draft is comparable to the Colts. The Pats have more UFAs and we've used 4 picks to acquire 3 players, two of whom are all pros. They have more UDFA (which according to your logic means they don't draft well). They have 4 more drafted players on their team but have one more 1st rounder and more late rounders which may mean they miss more in rounds 2 and 3 than the Pats.
You have been consistently been referring to the the past 5 years not since 2004, but that still doesn't change the my argument. The Pats are a good drafting team and a good team at evaluating and developing UDFA talent and the numbers back that up. They aren't perfect but they are also not the Lions, Rams, Bears, Bucs, or KC.
hahahah...LMFAO at you.......you fill a paragraph with garbage and the LALALALA I DON'T HEAR YOU.....
your first paragraph is baseless.......use names and examples instead of spinning
I didn't dismiss cassel.....in fact, I was the one who mentioned him.....but I still think he is a lousy QB
keep trying to say nothing........you are good at it
Last edited: