Welcome to PatsFans.com

Belichick: Let Coaches Challenge Everything

Discussion in 'NFL Football Forum' started by JMC00, Dec 3, 2013.

  1. JMC00

    JMC00 On the Roster

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,009
    Likes Received:
    120
    Ratings:
    +311 / 5 / -7

  2. Kdo5

    Kdo5 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,267
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +14 / 5 / -3

    I love our coach. It sounds like a really good idea...as if the NFL would implement it.
  3. captain stone

    captain stone Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    8,614
    Likes Received:
    53
    Ratings:
    +120 / 26 / -18

    No Jersey Selected

    I am in complete, 100% agreement. Everything - E V E R Y T H I N G - should be challengeable.
  4. Big-T

    Big-T On the Roster

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    4,201
    Likes Received:
    147
    Ratings:
    +339 / 11 / -4

    #51 Jersey

    Well, it'd be 30 yards a game more for the opposition to overcome just from holding FINALLY being called on the LT for mauling Chandler Jones!

    It should cut out on some of the other BS you see in every game every week.
  5. RelocatedPatFan

    RelocatedPatFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,297
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +23 / 0 / -0

    Would it affect league policy to give Peyton some defensive pass interference or would those just be ruled inconclusive automatically. :bricks:
  6. Wheelman

    Wheelman Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ratings:
    +50 / 3 / -1

    #18 Jersey

    I don't entirely agree with Belichick here. Challenging a holding call or pass interference is asking for a 2nd opinion. I don't like that idea.

    However, challenging something like fair-catch interference where it's black and white whether you contacted the punt returner. I think you should be able to challenge that.
  7. Sicilian

    Sicilian On the Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,916
    Likes Received:
    122
    Ratings:
    +272 / 1 / -2

    I agree. I feel like part of the cat and mouse game between corners and wide receivers is the grey line between legal and holding/illegal contact. Every good corner TECHNICALLY breaks the rules by giving a tiny tug with every contact. They'll get away with it for 99% of the game, but then a coach can come along on a pivotal play at the end, knowing he can technically win a challenge to extend a drive.

    Leave judgment calls out of it, unless you can find a way to make them more black and white.
  8. neuronet

    neuronet Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #87 Jersey

    If you allow non-calls to be challenged (e.g., PI, holding) things get weird, but heck why not...
  9. Salva135

    Salva135 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2008
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I've thought this for a million years. It's a complete joke that coaches get two challenges a game. The refs hate smarter coaches that should be allowed to challenge whenever they want without penalty. They don't want their authority challenged. The Refs Union won't like that.
  10. Brady6

    Brady6 On the Roster

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    9,423
    Likes Received:
    342
    Ratings:
    +731 / 77 / -119

    #12 Jersey

    I think they should be permitted more than 2 challenges per half but I think if they were allowed to challenge everything the games would be extended dramatically. Human error is also one of the components of pro sports that make the games interesting and entertaining, they could easily replace every home plate baseball umpire with a strike zone machine but that would pull from the human element.
  11. Patjew

    Patjew PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,588
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ratings:
    +69 / 2 / -0

    No Jersey Selected

    I hate how everything in the last 2 minutes and in OT goes "upstairs".
  12. Salva135

    Salva135 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2008
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Belichick is the only real one left in the new NFL musical chairs of coaching, so when he feels the need to express a controversial opinion that doesn't jive with Goodell, we should all listen.
  13. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,512
    Likes Received:
    270
    Ratings:
    +603 / 6 / -0

    I'm with you, especially since slo-mo can actually be a little deceiving on some of those judgement calls. Football is played in real time.

    Plus, wasn't the nearly penalty-free game Sunday a rare pleasure to watch? The more pauses to review, the more the game loses its rhythm. As fans, maybe we should accept the tradeoff of a little more human error for a game that gets into a groove and stays there.
  14. patfanken

    patfanken On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,700
    Likes Received:
    241
    Ratings:
    +423 / 13 / -8

    #91 Jersey

    I think BB is right on the money. The key to making it work is the limit of 2 challenges per game. So a smart HC wouldn't challenge a miss offside early in the first quarter for example.

    However I would add 2 additions or proviso's to his rule.

    1. The ref should no longer make the replays. It simply takes too long. Add a replay ref to sits in the TV truck to makes all replay calls. Those challenged and those by rule.

    2. HC's should be aware that not no-call of a holding call, offensively or defensively, or PI (the judgement calls) is going to be changed unless the infraction was BLATANT and significantly affect the play. That would eliminate the real marginal calls or plays far away from the action. The coaching staffs would know not to throw the flag unless it was a clear foul. That would eliminate the issue of there being "a holding call on every play"

    So as long as the HC only gets 2 it shouldn't slow down the game as there would only be 4 reviews per game and teams would save them like TO's until the 2nd half

    BTW- Ever wonder why the smartest, most knowledgeable, and experience HC has never been asked to be on the competition committee?? Over the years guys like Shula and Pulian have used their power to shape the rules to constantly benefit THEIR teams.

    BB knows its a joke and has poked his finger in their eyes for years. There no question that the entire "spygate" sage was sweet revenge for those jealous and envious losers.
  15. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    23,106
    Likes Received:
    383
    Ratings:
    +859 / 8 / -10

    Disable Jersey

    A major FU to the refs and NFL brass from BB. Gotta luv it!
    Now watch us get 30 holding calls vs the Browns. :mad:
  16. Brady6

    Brady6 On the Roster

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Messages:
    9,423
    Likes Received:
    342
    Ratings:
    +731 / 77 / -119

    #12 Jersey

    You say that because the Panthers game is so fresh in everybody’s head but when the games start lasting from 1pm to 630pm with 50% of that time with a ref under the hood you’d have a different outlook. Human error is part of sports, you make everything challengeable and before long you’re playing a video game.
  17. zen

    zen Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I like his reasoning. This makes it a bit more simpler and fairer. The NFL probably will not do it though as they like complexity and confusion.
  18. Observer

    Observer Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    Correct officiating always makes the game better, never worse. I don't understand what you are saying.

    There are just too many rules in football though that are entirely subjective so that even replays will not be able to remove controversy.
  19. RelocatedPatFan

    RelocatedPatFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,297
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +23 / 0 / -0

    did you read the article? Coaches would still only have 2 (3 if the prior 2 are successful) challenges per game. they can't challenge every play, that would (indeed) be ridiculous.
  20. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,512
    Likes Received:
    270
    Ratings:
    +603 / 6 / -0

    I wonder how specific the challenge would have to be? A wide-open challenge system could end up with a lot of gamesmanship.

    Let's say that you're on defense, and in one slow-developing play the QB stays in the pocket for quite a while then throws a pass that turns into an 80-yard TD. Wouldn't you be tempted to challenge based on "offensive holding," even if you saw nothing, hoping and trusting that a careful review of every blocker would end up revealing at least a moment of holding?

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>