StrawHatPatriot
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
- Messages
- 1,288
- Reaction score
- 1,210
You first......how is it simplifying?
Read what I said, and also what SnakeEyes said again.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You first......how is it simplifying?
Was GRR good?
That OL was a mess that was schemed around......they could do that with this unit but the QB won't like it....either that or McDaniel don't know how
Welker costed little money, yet Belichick traded him due to personal beef, for example....
Please tell me how you "scheme around" a weak O-line. If the players can't go tow to toe with the D-linemen you're going to have a problem, scheme doesn't fix the problem of the other guy simply beating you.
Just a note on the subject without any analysis - Of all the current head coaches only Marvin Smith has been the coach of the same team without winning a Super Bowl longer than Bill Belichick.
I am pretty sure he is the longest tenured but I would have to double check.How many HCs are there in the league that have been with one team longer than BB has been with the Pats?
I think the problem with BB began quite a few years ago. He's still a great coach because of his preparation, but all his original and best ideas have been copied, from situational football, to clock management, to bend but don't break, to team professionalism, to one game at a time, among others. Further, given his success, every team has studied BB more than anyone else. So many times in the past I've heard announcers refer to a late season game against a weaker opponent as that team's Superbowl -- the idea that beating the Patriots would be huge for any team. Well, teams now know BB -- they've copied him, they've studied him, at times they have obsessed over his game plans.
In the past, even when the Pats played a stronger opponent, BB could always find ways to make the other team miserable -- they might beat us, but they wouldn't get to play their game. In the past, even when had glaring weaknesses, BB found ways to hide those weaknesses or correct them. But, our opponents have been working for years to solve the problems that BB-coached team present. I think the best teams have, and that knowledge is slowly filtering through the NFL.
I wouldn't put it past BB to turn this team around, but he also faces the fact that Wilford, Gronk, and Brady, while still exceptional and among the best at their positions, may not be the superstars they once were. Add to that the reality that Dante Scarnecchia always found a way to make our OL work, even when it lacked talent. Dave DeGuglielmo just doesn't seem to be as talented. And, what's up with Josh McDaniels! Did anyone see an offensive strategy in that game? The whole game we seemed to be improvising, and the absence of Dobson and Thompkins, our deep threats, basically signaled to Any Reid our offensive strategy. So, our problems run deep.
If the Pats are going to turn things around, they are going to need a BB who once again thinks outside of the box and also gets a handle on what other teams now know about the Pats. The Pats have enough talent to be at least competitive against any team, but the NFL is obviously in the post-BB era. BB must adapt.
Belichick did not trade Wes Welker. He offered him MORE money than he eventually signed with in Denver, and Welker kept turning it down during the previous year when he made 10+ million under the franchise tag.
Even in the end, Belichick still offered Welker a fair, comparable contract at 2/10 that had way more guaranteed year one money than Denver's 2/12 offer, which he signed for.
We are all in the mood to pile on Bill Belichick, but I'm not sure that we're really qualified to do so without knowing the ins and outs of some of these situations.
I think the problem with BB began quite a few years ago. He's still a great coach because of his preparation, but all his original and best ideas have been copied, from situational football, to clock management, to bend but don't break, to team professionalism, to one game at a time, among others. Further, given his success, every team has studied BB more than anyone else. So many times in the past I've heard announcers refer to a late season game against a weaker opponent as that team's Superbowl -- the idea that beating the Patriots would be huge for any team. Well, teams now know BB -- they've copied him, they've studied him, at times they have obsessed over his game plans.
I've suspected the 1st time the Giants played the Pats in the SB, it was Tom Coughlin knowledge of BB when they were both Parcells assistants that could have made the difference. That can cut both ways, but somehow I think Coughlin got the edge on this one.
Peyton Manning has about 1/3 the arm strength he used to have, he still plays well because Elway surrounds him with talent, Elway spends every last nickel of cap space because he knows after Manning it is likely going to be a lot harder. Belichick the GM is to blame, I hate say it because I idolize the man (as a coach) but he has let the team down with his personnel decisions.
Exactly Brady6, That's difference between Broncos & Patriots. Elway seein light at end of tunnel is either bein successful or a speeding locomotive comin right at Broncos but either way he gave Manning all his tools to never miss a beat especially at stage of his career. Imagine what Brady could do with Manning's receivers? That washed up, Brady's DONE talk would NEVER Be even thought of let alone topic of conversation.
i love BB and what he has done for this team...however i have been saying this for a while. The game is passing BB by and he needs to quit being stubborn and adapt to the times. This is not the 80s and we dont need 270lb LBs. We need speed and more athletic players. We need to tweak the offense so that more FAs and draftees can come in an be successful. He cant continue to draft like he has and think he is outsmarting everyone. Things need to change and the Krafts need to sit down with him and have a serious conversation with him. Things need to change
I agree; if Brady had Manning's receivers and OL, he would be tearing it up.
BB as a GM is mediocre. Not a disaster, but not nearly the best. He has a particular blind stop when drafting WRs. I do not know who is behind the disastrous chiseling of contracts, maybe BB maybe J. Kraft.
If BB had a GM who was as bad as he has been, that GM would have been fired.
Again, let's stop with the Welker myth. The Patriots had years to give him a legit deal, but never offered him one.
Again, let's stop with the Welker myth. The Patriots had years to give him a legit deal, but never offered him one.