- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 16,682
- Reaction score
- 3,686
Since when are multiple reports "no evidence"?
Since they are nothing more than non-specific innuendos. Look at Greg Bedard's "report" cited in the OP:
"The chatter that I'm hearing from around the Patriots is that he is not exactly popular with the players."
Gee, that's specific. They're playing like ****, and DeGuglielmo succeeded an icon. Of course there's going to be "chatter". It's not a popularity contest. And what any of that non-specific dissatisfaction has to do with the decision to play Cannon at LG - a decision which likely was made at the very least jointly with BB - completely eludes me.
Since when do multiple non-specific reports constitute "evidence"?