Bears sign Alex Bannister

Discussion in ' - Patriots Fan Forum' started by pats1, Jun 28, 2006.

  1. pats1

    pats1 Moderator Supporter

    BB thought highly of him on special teams, and when he was released, there was speculation here and I believe from Felger that he could be New England bound.
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2006
  2. mgcolby

    mgcolby Woohoo, I'm a VIP!!! Supporter

    I am not %100 positive that the Pats will bring in another wide reciever and if they do I think it will most likely be done in a trade.

    The reason for my opinion is because of the fact that we have 3 TE's, one TE/FB hybrid dude and 3 RB's that can catch out of the Backfield.
  3. Remix 6

    Remix 6 Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    maybe its because we dont need a ST player is why we didnt sign him. Hes not much of a WR..he doesnt return kicks..hes just a ST player and we have plenty of them. Jones, Mitchell, Scott, Izzo, Davis are our better ST players. If we sign a WR..hes likely capable of playing #4-5 spot and bring in competition for Andrews at return man.

    btw has anyone heard anything on Mel Mitchell?
  4. Pats726

    Pats726 Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    I saw a pic of him in camp..but other than that???? MIA..I guess.... I agree only ST even though his agent wanted him to play WR..BUT he's tried and is NOT very good..yet...a good pickup by the Bears...
  5. 5 Rings for Brady!!

    5 Rings for Brady!! In the Starting Line-Up

    Belichick thinks highly of any player on any opposing team. He told us how fierce the Cardinals where back in 2004. I don't believe what he says, only what he does.

    It was funny when he went on and on in this year's draft about the great class of linebackers, and all the different options available. The media really bought into it, as did most of us. :singing:

Share This Page