Welcome to PatsFans.com

Bears designated LB Lance Briggs as their franchise player

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by MrBigglesWorth, Feb 16, 2007.

  1. MrBigglesWorth

    MrBigglesWorth Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,338
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0 / -0

    Lance Briggs-LB- Bears Feb. 16 - 5:16 pm et


    The Bears designated LB Lance Briggs as their franchise player Friday, guaranteeing him $7.2 million for 2007.

    Briggs is still free to sign an offer sheet with another team, but Chicago can match the offer or decide to take two first-round picks in return for letting him go.
    Source: ChicagoBears.com

    http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=3079
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2007
  2. patsox23

    patsox23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,387
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +9 / 1 / -0

    Adalius Thomas's price just went up even higher - unless Baltimore franchises him. Wonder if this means any of the other Bears' LBs (not named Urlacher) will be cut loose.
  3. MrBigglesWorth

    MrBigglesWorth Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,338
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0 / -0

    yeah Adalius should send him some flowers thanking him
  4. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,097
    Likes Received:
    144
    Ratings:
    +234 / 18 / -37

    #50 Jersey

    This doesn't make any sense? Why would Adalius Thomas be thanking Briggs? Thomas hits the 30 year mark prior the start of the year. Briggs will be 27 half way through the season.

    Thomas is a damn good LB, but he is slightly worse than Briggs.

    Also, Thomas should be thanking the BEARS, not Briggs.
  5. broadwayjoe

    broadwayjoe Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2004
    Messages:
    2,314
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Good move by the Bears I guess Lovie Smith will be next.
  6. MrBigglesWorth

    MrBigglesWorth Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,338
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0 / -0

    Lance still needs to sign the tender. Semantics on who to thank. Regardless, Adalius stands to be very rich.
  7. DaBruinz

    DaBruinz Pats, B's, Sox PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,097
    Likes Received:
    144
    Ratings:
    +234 / 18 / -37

    #50 Jersey

    They are all very rich. However, I think you are wrong in that I don't believe that Thomas is going to get as rich a contract as Briggs. Everyone figured that Thomas would get a contract in the $6 mill range. I don't believe that's changed.
  8. smg93

    smg93 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,809
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    The point is that since it just got more expensive to sign Briggs because another team would have to agree on compensation with the bears, the market for LB's just got thinner. Because it has, then Adalius Thomas' chances of landing either a big FA contract or guaranteed money for being a franchised player has become that much more certain.
  9. Patriot Missile

    Patriot Missile Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    5,404
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +63 / 4 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    I wouldn't be suprised if Adalius Thomas gets tagged. If the Ravens cut J Lewis and Ogden retires they may have just enough to do so.

    It would be a shame to overpay for Edwards or Fletcher.
  10. MrBigglesWorth

    MrBigglesWorth Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,338
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0 / -0

    Oh Contraire,

    I have no idea where you got that from. I am insinuating now that Lance Briggs is franchised the supply and demand has gone in the favor of Thomas. There is one less LB out there and Thomas probably stands to get richer than Briggs because of the access to the bidding market.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>