- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 15,684
- Reaction score
- 17,145
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Before I change my sig, the fact we could've had Maulaga at #34.
Remember, this means we have Guyton as a starter
Before I change my sig, the fact we could've had Maulaga at #34.
Remember, this means we have Guyton as a starter
I stated this in another thread, obviously BB was not that impressed by Mauluaga (sp), Lauranitis, Barwin, etc. He passed on them NUMEROUS times. I thought for sure that when he traded up to 40 he was gonna take Barwin. It seems like a lot of times when the Pats work people out, it's either a smokescreen, or when the workouts actually happen, they realize the interest isn't there. There is obviously something missing in these prospects that was there in Mayo last year. Also, let's no forget, the Pats weren't the only teams to pass on these guys. Now, if Lauranitis becomes the next Urlacher, Mauluaga (sp) becomes the next Seau, and Barwin becomes the next Vrabel, I will be really really upset. But right now, I'm ok with BB passing them up.
As for Guyton as a starter: he did take one-third of the snaps last year, and I'm guessing that wasn't out of desperation.
Before I change my sig, the fact we could've had Maulaga at #34.
Remember, this means we have Guyton as a starter
Before I change my sig, the fact we could've had Maulaga at #34.
Remember, this means we have Guyton as a starter
Before I change my sig, the fact we could've had Maulaga at #34.