It's hard for to me figure out the Pats and anything related to the running game.
Why?
1) All I see them do is pass, pass, pass, which they do VERY Good.
-Yet at the same time, they rank in the top 10 in rushing YPG.
I wanted to know, how is this?
-Do the Pats really have a good running attack with a solid rotation between Maurney and Faulk, OR is this simply a by product of the good passing game opening up holes?
-In other words if the Pats had to run to win, could they or would they be in trouble ala 2001 Rams?
2) How is the Pats personnel suited to a running game?
-Are their OL solid all around or would they be less effective being physical not finesse as the running v pass is?
3) Why doesn't Bill have more runs?
-Is anybody concerned that in the playoffs this might hurt?
-Or it can lead to unneccsary QB sacks currently?
-You don't want him going Martzze.
Thanks.
Why?
1) All I see them do is pass, pass, pass, which they do VERY Good.
-Yet at the same time, they rank in the top 10 in rushing YPG.
I wanted to know, how is this?
-Do the Pats really have a good running attack with a solid rotation between Maurney and Faulk, OR is this simply a by product of the good passing game opening up holes?
-In other words if the Pats had to run to win, could they or would they be in trouble ala 2001 Rams?
2) How is the Pats personnel suited to a running game?
-Are their OL solid all around or would they be less effective being physical not finesse as the running v pass is?
3) Why doesn't Bill have more runs?
-Is anybody concerned that in the playoffs this might hurt?
-Or it can lead to unneccsary QB sacks currently?
-You don't want him going Martzze.
Thanks.