Welcome to PatsFans.com

Another trade at #33.

Discussion in 'Patriots Draft Talk' started by crowell33, Apr 28, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Wilkerson or Heyward would have been great 3-4 ends for the Pats. With them both gone I don't see the value at #33. Almost certain some team trades up for Andy Dalton or Gabe Carimi, not positions of need for Pats.
  2. randomk1

    randomk1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Trade everything into next year...it's not like we have an aging QB or something.
  3. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Best guess, #33 goes to Seattle for their late #2 this year (57) and a second next year.

    Seattle takes Dalton, jumping ahead of Cinncinnati
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2011
  4. PatDaPatriot

    PatDaPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Bears took Carimi...

    Otherwise, I definitely agree...
  5. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Thanks, I zoned out on that one.
  6. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    BB just said in his press conference that he has already heard from a couple of teams that have picks in the mid second round that have called about trading up to the Pats #33.
  7. DW Toys

    DW Toys Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,832
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +11 / 1 / -2

    That's nice, I say lets take 2011 off by taking a dive in the 2011 season and we will have great Draft choices in 2012.
    Maybe we can trade all of our picks tomorrow into 2012!

    Let's see...have we bettered our-self for 2011?....And the answer to that is?..... no. Solder is a year away. He might as well sit on the couch with me and watch the games so he doesn't get hurt.

    I can see him trading down to third and forth choices Friday then listening to the media say what a genius he is.

    One good Draft in five years qualifies I guess.

    Oh well. To be expected.

    Does anyone know of a phone company in Foxborough who can disconnect the phones at the Razor Friday so Bill can't trade down anymore?
    DW Toys
  8. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,344
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ratings:
    +46 / 1 / -4

    Walk away from the ledge, DW. LOL. The Pats have plenty of picks to go yet. They will probably end up with around 10 selections plus 2-3 extra picks for 2012 before the dust settles. There are still some solid players that can be taken in round 2.
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2011
  9. meggett

    meggett Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    hahahahahahaha. im with you...i may not be on the ledge right now, but ive taken the whole bottle of pills, and now im trying to decide if im going to make myself throw up.:deadhorse:
  10. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,389
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +211 / 14 / -2

    This seems about right. At some point we will likely secure another 2012 pick. This seems a very reasonable possibility. We would still have the same 3 2's and 2 3's tomorrow as we do now.

    I also could see someone else wanting to trade up in addition to Seattle. Belichick has a long, long time to listen to offers.

  11. mac

    mac Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    And then next year, we trade the Seattle second for a pick in 2013....etc etc. And from 17, 28, and 33 we wind up with Solder and three late round seconds. Huh? And by the way, no team with #1 next year is going to trade the Andrew Luck spot.

    Instead, why not be bold? Why not take a gamble on premium talent? Take Mallett at 33 and be done with it.
  12. meggett

    meggett Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    i think you only trade the 33 for a first rounder in 2012. anything less and it defeats the purpose.
  13. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think you can move down and get two seconds, one this year and one next
  14. meggett

    meggett Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    you had me. im right there with you. but you lost me big time with the last sentence. lets be rational here. but the first paragraph....couldnt have said it better myself.
  15. meggett

    meggett Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    thats the 33rd pick for a 2nd rounder in 2012. we would be getting a lower 2nd round pick to make up for our lost 33rd. why trade a very high second round pick in 2011 for a second rounder in 2012?? just make the pick at 33 and be done with it.
  16. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think I was unclear. You move down in the second round and Also get an additional 2nd next year. You would still have 3 seconds and 2 thirds left this year and 2 firsts and 2 seconds next year
  17. crowell33

    crowell33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  18. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,635
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +15 / 0 / -1

  19. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,389
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +211 / 14 / -2

  20. Big Bucks

    Big Bucks Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    :idea2:
    Absolute nonsence. Rams, would they trade? Carolina after taking Newton... or how about Titans who spent 8th overall today, or Jags who took Gabbert. Teams that have $30m guarenteed in QBs cannot afford two of them.
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>