- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 31,007
- Reaction score
- 15,560
Who are the two Jacksons on PUP, though?
C, WR, and E, DB
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Who are the two Jacksons on PUP, though?
Me too. I don't want to use a first round pick for depth. I want a guy who will take a starting position.I still don't like the depth at NT too much - although I'm happy with the SF #1 next year I would have been quite happy taking Alan Branch at #28.
It wouldn't be ironic at all, The Jest only drafted two viable players, their other picks would only make the roster over ours because The Jest is a weaker team. Additionally, the Patriots could have drafted Harris at #28 but passed which gives a not so subtle hint at their feelings towards him. Lastly, our two big trades (except Moss) were to trade into next year, not pick up multiple picks this year by trading down.At the time of the draft the Jets were criticized for packaging most of their draft picks to obtain two potential starters. The Pats were praised for not doing the same. It will be ironic if the Jets end up with more Patriot's picks making their roster than we have making ours.
I have little doubt Brown would have made the team. Hill would have battled the LeKevin Smiths for the bottom of the roster as others can play NT if needed. Hill, RIP, was beaten out by Mike Wright, a UDFA, and was a turnstile on the rare occasions he played. Sorry to be politically incorrect but Hill's time on the roster was coming to an end, it had to be.I would think the only candidates for the 53 were Merriwether and perhaps Brown. Although I thought Kareem Brown's chances were marginal as he is a boom or bust guy. With the unfortuante death of Mr. Hill, he may find a roster spot, for at least a year.
I think Gafney (or however you spell it) is ahead of caldwell
None of the Offesnive linmen drafted were any way near being ready for the NFL. That was a reason that they were so heavily discounted as players. All were developmental players needing at least a year or three of body building and position conversion before they are ready. Allare smnmart, and hard workers but htat is all. Hence they are all Practice Squad candidates.
Ditto for Gutierrez at QB. Justin Rodgers is another developmentl guy with smarts, size, and acceptable speed For Lb; and no experience playing at the position. He too is a Practice squad candidate.
Oscar Lua is the only later Day 2 candidate that is anywhere near ready to play the position for which he was drafted. But he is a marginal talent. He has neither size, nor speed, nor athletic talent that would make him a great player. But he can be a ST talent, perhaps.
I would think the only candidates for the 53 were Merriwether and perhaps Brown. Although I thought Kareem Brown's chances were marginal as he is a boom or bust guy. With the unfortuante death of Mr. Hill, he may find a roster spot, for at least a year.
This draft, but especially so, cannot be fairly evaluated for at least three years to see what occurs with the developmental players.
I'll go on record predicting that Kaczur will start at RT on Week One for some team not called the New England Patriots.
If both O'Callaghan and Britt will look good in TC, and at least one of the Day Two rooks shows enough to earn a roster spot, Kaczur will be expendable (in the same way R-Randall, Ashworth and Gorin were expendable) and attractive (with his starting experience, size and athleticism) to other teams.
I think BB will take a 2008 3rd rounder for him.
Just an accumulation of "stuff" that you hear.
Yeah, I know, but there's been about three references to maturity, work ethic, attitude that all seem to be independent. He's just someone I have a bad feeling about - and I expect to be proven to be correctI'm not saying that this isn't true, but what happens is that someone offers an opinion as fact on a message board or talk radio, someone else repeats it, that gets repeated, and, all of a sudden, there is an "accumulation" of "stuff".
Yeah, I know, but there's been about three references to maturity, work ethic, attitude that all seem to be independent. He's just someone I have a bad feeling about - and I expect to be proven to be correct
The most recent was from Tomase here :Not being a **** here, but could you show me instances where this stuff has been said about Kaczur? I've honestly never heard anything negative about the guy, so am just curious as to what you are referencing.