Raymond
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,276
- Reaction score
- 1,901
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Minus the 2 HUGE game changing drops in the most important games to date in his career. Send him to Denver with Peyton they are a match made in Heaven.
Per @adamschefter Wes Welker was shopping for a new pair of gloves but each kept slipping off. #butterfingersarementtobeeating #cantbelieveitsnotbutter
Minus the 2 HUGE game changing drops in the most important games to date in his career. Send him to Denver with Peyton they are a match made in Heaven.
Per @adamschefter Wes Welker was shopping for a new pair of gloves but each kept slipping off. #butterfingersarementtobeeating #cantbelieveitsnotbutter
I'm firmly in the depends on the money camp. I was however very impressed by his post season this year. People want to focus in on a bad drop and another catch they think he should've had, but he was very effective in both games. Add to that that he was taking over the punt returning duties, and doing a very good job of it, I don't understand how these POs would have a negative effect on people's views of WW. Hopefully he's still sporting the flying elvis next season.
So how much should the Pats pay Welker this offseason?
I have said it many times, 4-40, with 20 guaranteed, which is really like 3-30 with a club option and very little risk. Brady probably has 4 more really good seasons in him, maximizing the opportunity for Lombardi's during that time should be priority number 1, and taking away his most productive weapon is the worst approach possible if that is the goal.
If they can get Welker to agree to a deal for less then I am fine with that, and if it is something like 4-32 with 20 guaranteed then they are getting a stea because his production commands much much more than that.
Wes Welker has performed like a HOF player for the Patriots, yetany here act like he is worth next to nothing, it's an embarrassment to all Patriot fans, and really makes them look like they absolutely nothing about football. According to Brady he is the best player he has ever played with, and it doesn't get higher than that when it comes to praise.
Not at all. Im for getting rid of WR'S who cant catch balls in crunch time. Wes is a system wr easily replaceable. Plus we have enough guys to dominate the middle of the field we dont need a aging wr who cant make that catch to get his team to the next lvl. Per @adamschefter @weswelker has use speaker phone for now on cause he drops his phone to much #icantbelieveitsnotbuttah
I have said it many times, 4-40, with 20 guaranteed, which is really like 3-30 with a club option and very little risk. Brady probably has 4 more really good seasons in him, maximizing the opportunity for Lombardi's during that time should be priority number 1, and taking away his most productive weapon is the worst approach possible if that is the goal.
If they can get Welker to agree to a deal for less then I am fine with that, and if it is something like 4-32 with 20 guaranteed then they are getting a stea because his production commands much much more than that.
Wes Welker has performed like a HOF player for the Patriots, yetany here act like he is worth next to nothing, it's an embarrassment to all Patriot fans, and really makes them look like they absolutely nothing about football. According to Brady he is the best player he has ever played with, and it doesn't get higher than that when it comes to praise.
If there weren't a salary cap, then sure. He has definitely outplayed his past contract. But that's not how things work. Every dollar you use to overpay Welker based on past production rather than future expectations in one less dollar to use to convince a fourth year player to stick around through his prime. From this point onward, the Pats need to spend their cap money how they think it best helps the team. Using that money to overpay Welker because they didn't pay him enough early in his career is not how they do that.If nothing else, the Patriots owe it to him for what he has ALREADY done and not be compensated for.
What's wrong with Gronk or Hernandez as the #1 option?I don't mind if Welker comes back, but he cannot be the #1 option in this offense. He needs a guy like Moss that can provide a big play, draw double teams, and catch while covered. Even better if they can get a big receiver over 6 feet in height and a speedy receiver. I don't mind Welker going if they can get some depth and size/speed at the position and if they can resign Talib too.
Losing a 100 catch a year player in Welker would be tough, but if it means getting back a few receivers that can stretch the field, I'm all for it.
I would not be surprised whatsoever if the New England Patriots come back with the same offer once again.Posted by Michael David Smith on May 17, 2012, 1:31 PM EST
Getty ImagesPatriots receiver Wes Welker has signed his franchise tender and is in the fold for the 2012 season, but that doesn’t mean he’s satisfied with the way negotiations on a long-term contract have gone.
In fact, Welker says the Patriots are now offering him less money than the two-year, $16 million, fully guaranteed deal they offered during the 2011 season.
Mankins coming back has worked out fine. He's the team's best offensive lineman.
As for Welker, nobody's brought up the other alternative, in terms of lowering cap hit, which is to sign him for a [highlight]longer[/highlight] contract in order to push some of the money into later, unguaranteed, years. This team is very cap savvy. If they want to keep Welker and still have money for other moves, they can manipulate the numbers enough to do it. Also, just winning on the Fanene claim would more than offset any Welker money uptick.
Patriots now offering Welker less than they offered last year | ProFootballTalk
I would not be surprised whatsoever if the New England Patriots come back with the same offer once again.