Am I the only one who does NOT want Welker back?

Discussion in ' - Patriots Fan Forum' started by MrNathanDrake, Jan 23, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MrNathanDrake

    MrNathanDrake In the Starting Line-Up

    #95 Jersey

    He's going to be 32 years old in May.

    His drops seem to come at inopportune times in playoff games.

    He can't stretch the field. Pretty bad when your downfield threats are your Tight Ends.

    Makes the offense predictable.

    Gets hit hard, which often swings momentum to the opposing defense.

    We've had numerous chances to win a Superbowl with Welker, but just can't seem to do it. (2007, 2011, 2012). Simply put, I think it's time to move on.

    2009, 2010, and now 2012.... The Patriots got "Bullied" in their playoff loses. All of them at a home. I wouldn't mind moving on from these smaller, finesse WR's who get pushed around.

    Welker is a great slot receiver. A great complimentry #2 WR. But he's not that #1 WR I want as the main option.

    If the Pats are giving out big money to a WR this year, I'd rather they give out a little extra and get a WR with serious speed who can catch a deep ball and make our offense less predictable.

    I also think we have to draft a WR in the 1st or 2nd round of the draft, regardless of Welker being signed or not. We can't go into next season with Deion Branch as the #3 WR.
  2. Brady2Moss

    Brady2Moss Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job


    Biggest problem with Welker is that he's not the number 1 receiver this team needs, but deserves to be paid as one. Time for us and him to move on.
  3. deters

    deters Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    #87 Jersey

    no your not the only one. I don't want him back unless we get him for less than $6 mill a year but that is highly unlikely, so I doubt he will return.
  4. PatriotDynasty_12

    PatriotDynasty_12 On the Game Day Roster

    Need a deep threat to compliment Lloyd on the outside. Hernandez, Gronk, Ballard can handle the middle of the field. I love Welks, but the $ that would be required to sign him, should be going to a deep threat this off-season if BB is serious about winning a SB
  5. TheSparks1

    TheSparks1 Practice Squad Player

    Forgot about Ballard. Good call!
  6. Brady_to_Moss

    Brady_to_Moss Butler Island is here Supporter

    #95 Jersey

    some of you will change your minds if he does leave..i can bet that
  7. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah Supporter Supporter

    Disable Jersey

    Has Ivan's PC crashed?
  8. deters

    deters Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    #87 Jersey

    WR - Bowe/Jennings, Lloyd, 1st or 2nd rd pick, Edelman, Slater
    TE - Nandez, Gronk, Ballard, Hoohoo

    If we do acquire either one of those WR's and hit a home run on a WR in the draft, we will be set for the next 4+ years.
  9. Nunchucks

    Nunchucks In the Starting Line-Up

    Patriots offense relies far too much on Welker.
  10. patsfaninpa

    patsfaninpa In the Starting Line-Up

    I'm really torn on it. In fact, I'm going to predict that we don't sign; Welker, Talib or Vollmer. I think we have an in-house replacement at RT in Marcus Cannon. Talib probably isn't worth what he's going to command. We talk about him like he's Mike Haynes. Hell, he's just a good player. Not, an all pro. Now, why I think we might not keep Welker.

    First, I don't think we let him walk unless we have a trade or signing in place for another wr. We don't want to piss off TFB a la 2006. Maybe, sign Greg Jennings or trade for Percy Harvin. Don't want to get bogged down in the name to play his position. He won't be as productive. But, if he is truly a downfield threat. Does that not open things up for Gronk and AHern whom we've extended already. There's your inside receivers and chain movers. In theory, they should have more room to operate with "NEW WR" and Lloyd. Gronk runs down the seam. You still have 2 excellent options in the flat with Shane Vereen and Aaron Hernandez. Not saying it's the best thing, or the wrong thing. But, I think that's the route we're headed.

    We still have a lot of cap space and maybe some extra picks if we trade Mallett. Don't want to get into an off-season mock. Just why we may not keep Welker.
  11. dannydyn

    dannydyn Supporter Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    I'd get rid of Lloyd before I get rid of Welker. At least WW can take a hit, and more importantly get substantial YAC.

    Lloyd is an imbecile who collapses as soon as he catches the ball. He was also brought in to stretch the field, but I can count the number of deep catches he's made, on one hand.
  12. fxkane

    fxkane Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    We're hardly the best team for locating top wide receivers. 99% of the time Wes Welker is Mr Competence. He is often the difference obviously between a win and a loss. He knows how to handle punts (no small talent). He often has the surest hands and the most receptions in an endless number of single games. And he certainly cannot be blamed for being Brady's most comfortable and safest target.

    This last game has me scratching my head quite a bit, but I refuse to scapegoat perhaps the most clutch player in Pats history. If the price is too high so be it, but let's not set it too low because of one dropped pass in one of our least impressive performances of the season.
  13. Rob0729

    Rob0729 Supporter Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    I want Welker back, but not at any price. I think if they can replace him with say Greg Jennings or another top notch WR and bring back Edelman, then they can afford to lose Welker. They need a solid to stud WR to replace Welker to make it worth while to let him leave.
  14. Rob0729

    Rob0729 Supporter Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    Yet, Lloyd led the team in first down catches with 50 and was second to only Gronk in YPC. How he wasn't cut by now is beyond me.

    I really don't get the irrational hate of Lloyd. The guy is a solid #2 WR. He definitely isn't Ochocinco 2.0.
  15. Sciz

    Sciz Supporter Supporter

    I'd love to have Welker back, just not at the $9-10M that he's expected to want.
  16. PatsFan2

    PatsFan2 In the Starting Line-Up

    #87 Jersey

    This we agree on completely Rob...I think Greg Jennings would be perfect in our Offense his Route running is off the charts.
  17. JMC00

    JMC00 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    I say let Welker go, Let Branch go outright and not even put him on the shadow roster. Maybe sign someone like Brandon Gibbons (McDaniels has some familiarity), resign Edelman and draft a couple of guys.

    I like Wilfork#75's idea of getting Justin Hunter and Da'Rick Rogers (or Wheaton, Woods or Hamilton) if available when the Pats picks came up.

    The Wes Welker driven offense just doesn't get it done in the post season. Let it be an offense driven by Gronk, two outside receivers and Hernandez in the slot.
  18. dannydyn

    dannydyn Supporter Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    I never said Lloyd is useless. But if I had to let one loose.... Lloyd would be the one. Sorry... WW has been more valuable and productive than Lloyd.
  19. PatsFan2

    PatsFan2 In the Starting Line-Up

    #87 Jersey

    Seriously who could dispute that??? There were many games this season where we couldn't find Lloyd with a search warrant. What would be his cap if let go? I am sure we can find somebody in the Draft who can do what he does.
  20. JMC00

    JMC00 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Actually Welker did with 72 and Gronk had 45 in 11 games, so the argument could be that had Gronk not missed the 5 games Lloyd would have had less than 50 first downs as some would have went to Gronk.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page