RayClay
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2005
- Messages
- 26,958
- Reaction score
- 9,712
Reiss brain teaser.
I know the roster and try to keep up, but my memory isn't what it used to be.
Reading this from Reiss' column
New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston
I'm trying to think (logically) who the fourth is. Ebert on the PS, Branch gone, probably use Hernandez or even Vereen if needed.
Oh yeah, it's the guy that's caught one pass in 5 years, of course! Not like i didn't know that, but why mention the ones that play and leave out the imaginary depth? Good job on that 46 yarder, I'd love to see more bombs, but still....
At the risk of giving myself nightmares, I believe he's played (?) safety more than WR. Is he on the depth chart there too? I don't think so (hopefully not).
Oh well, it just made me laugh today. All 4 receivers are suited up and ready to go, or to play teams all day, at least.
I know the roster and try to keep up, but my memory isn't what it used to be.
Reading this from Reiss' column
2. Wide receivers all to suit up. All four of the Patriots wide receivers were limited in practice this week and listed as questionable, but all four will dress today, including Julian Edelman (concussion). Edelman fills in behind Wes Welker and Brandon Lloyd on the wide receiver depth chart, and has played his best football of 2012 in recent weeks.
New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston
I'm trying to think (logically) who the fourth is. Ebert on the PS, Branch gone, probably use Hernandez or even Vereen if needed.
Oh yeah, it's the guy that's caught one pass in 5 years, of course! Not like i didn't know that, but why mention the ones that play and leave out the imaginary depth? Good job on that 46 yarder, I'd love to see more bombs, but still....
At the risk of giving myself nightmares, I believe he's played (?) safety more than WR. Is he on the depth chart there too? I don't think so (hopefully not).
Oh well, it just made me laugh today. All 4 receivers are suited up and ready to go, or to play teams all day, at least.