- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,794
- Reaction score
- 20,459
You've concluded he's at some level, just as I have, regardless of what that level might be. Without doing so, you couldn't have made your initial claim about where Forte would rank in comparison to him, so stop with the straw man. And, given that you've already stated your opinion of White's level, in this very thread:
I think we should just dismiss this post of yours and move on.
Yes, I have stated that I think White is bad at running between the tackles based on what I've seen so far. Very bad. I've also stated that Forte, at this point in his career, isn't a whole lot better and will only keep getting worse. These statements are not mutually exclusive.
Separately, using White's 2.5 YPC on 22 total carries to conclude that he's "absolute horseshit" in comparison to Forte's 4.1 YPC is both nonsense and disingenuous. When Brandon Bolden's first 23 carries went for 152 yards, I'm sure you were at the front of the line warning people that that was way too small of a sample size to declare that he's an elite, 6.3 YPC runner. Yet you have no issue with burying White over an equally tiny sample size.
I dunno why you keep shifting the goalposts around here, I've been consistent throughout: White is bad between the tackles. Forte is better, but not much. If White had 210 carries for Chicago last year, he'd do much better than 2.5 YPC, partly because pretty much anyone will get well over 2.5 YPC when given more than 22 carries, and partly because any impression reached on White after 30 career carries is pretty much by definition premature. He's looked awful to date, but it's overwhelmingly likely that if he was given more than 22 carries (and more than 3 in a single game) he'd look at least moderately better than he has.
Last edited: