JoeSixPat
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 10,671
- Reaction score
- 1,043
huskeralk said:I don't think we're better off without him but for over $3 million a year, I definately don't want him.
I'd keep him at this price while he's playing well - but the important factor isn't going to be the annual salary... its going to be the amount of guaranteed money.
Overpaying a kicker doesn't break the bank like overpaying for other positions. We're talking about a difference of $500,000.
What I expect Adam is focused on is guaranteed money. Adam and the Pats have very different perceptions of how long he can perform at his high level and they are giving him an opportunity to test the market for guaranteed money.
The Pats think the offers will be in line with what they've offered. Adam thinks he can get more from another team and I believe will sincerely give the Pats a chance to match.
I think the feeling on the Pats part was that such a scenario was going to play out this year or next (when his tag salary would have jumped to the truly unpalatable $3.6 million) so best to let it play out this season when CBA uncertainty might put some limits on the market.
That was the wisest move for the Pats, but I'll still lament his loss if and when that happens.