Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by IcyPatriot, Aug 28, 2009.
Currently 775+ professional scientists & engineers asking questions.
Some people need to give it a rest. Seriously.
Well I guess you're not one of the 775+
This is new information just published in a physics journal ... nice that they don't think like you RW.
This isn't a link from some left or right wing media rag - it's from a physics journal.
Why? ......... please be specific.
From the physics journal - this is public material so it does not have to follow the normal copyright rules as it is available free to all.
keep up the good work, conspiracy theorists.......the real answer lies on the grassy knoll
Why don't you at least take the time to read the journal article before you post. Do you have any knowledge to explain the thermite ... no ... you don't. But you "Tanked" from the PoFo forum feel so inclined to debunk scientists ... classic thread title knee-jerk reaction posting.
"Spheres formed during ignition of commercial thermite, with corresponding typical XDS spectrum"
"Spheres formed during ignition of red/gray chip in DSC, with corresponding typical XEDS spectrum
"Spheres extracted from WTC dust" and "XEDS spectrum from a sphere found in the WTC dust"
As long there is any tiny shred of doubt, there will be conspiracy theorists whining about the "truth"
Wait... please tell the forum why it's all nonsense.
And when did a gaping cavern of conflicting testimony and suspicious evidence amount to "tiny shred?"... Just curious.
This is what I don't get; you have a huge issue with "inside job/ controlled demolition" people being lumped in with the "they let it happen" crew and yet here you are jumping in the fray. The "truth" movement seems to be just a group that is supportive of any conspiracy theory. I'm not saying that there is definitely no merit to your suspicions, but I don't get how you can get pissed at truthers being lumped together, and then support the controlled demolition theories.
Excuse me? When did I support demolition theory? I asked a question for an "official story" coincidence theorist or two to flesh out their surface dismissal of 9/11 truth as a whole.
Did you know they only spent $600,000 on the investigation?
I didn't think you did ... now you know.
Did you ever read Senator Dayton's testimony ... I doubt it:
Senator Dayton: I am just going to finish this if I may. Yet incredibly the NORAD commander did not pass that order to the fighter planes because he was "unsure how the pilots would or should proceed with this guidance." As you say Mr. Chairman, 'the situation is urgent' but we don't get protected in those circumstances but it's even worse when it's covered-up.
Oh so they spent a good deal of money therefor it must be the truth...ok then
Whining about thermite now talking about fighter planes...
Next up, it was the Martians...no wait it was the Venusians who did it
So, you can't answer my question. Noted.
No, I learned long ago not to argue with someone about this. Person will never listen to any reasoning or any logic or accept anything at face value.
Arguing with you would be pointless, so I'm not going to. Take it as a "win", take it as not "accepting the truth", take it and shove it up your butt for all I care- I'm not going to argue it.
LOL. What a response.
I'm willing to listen to reason and logic.
Please, tell the forum why a closer look into 9/11 overall is somehow not warranted, and why we should all just shut up....
No tripe. Just the facts you feel you can present.
Look into it overall= dig for more "facts" to prove conspiracy theories. Not going to do your research for you and not going to argue with people who don't want to see anything but their own ideals.
Interesting. So you make a claim that people revisiting 9/11 questions need to shut up, and when challenged on why you think that way, you punt to "you do the work yourself."
This is sorta like defense attorney telling the judge and jury "My client is innocent!... But I don't need to present a case for him... You guys examine the evidence... You're dumb if you don't acquit him... I have nothing further, your Honor."
There is no further research for me to do on the matter. I have, undoubtedly, lapped you in that field 20 times over regarding the facts of that day.
My conclusion, based on everything I have read, leaves no doubt that the official story regarding what happened that day, and all that summer, is largely fraudulent. Anyone still assigning themselves to "coincidence theory" regarding 9/11 is certainly not using deductive reasoning, and probably believes the odds of flopping 10 flushes in a row is also quite plausible.
Separate names with a comma.