Welcome to PatsFans.com

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust - WTC 9/11

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by IcyPatriot, Aug 28, 2009.

  1. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,694
    Likes Received:
    565
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    Currently 775+ professional scientists & engineers asking questions.

    BSP ::
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2009
  2. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    27,336
    Likes Received:
    255
    Ratings:
    +659 / 7 / -2

    Some people need to give it a rest. Seriously.
     
  3. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,694
    Likes Received:
    565
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

  4. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,694
    Likes Received:
    565
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    Last edited: Aug 28, 2009
  5. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Why? ......... please be specific.
     
  6. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,694
    Likes Received:
    565
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    From the physics journal - this is public material so it does not have to follow the normal copyright rules as it is available free to all.
    http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/gen.php?file=7TOCPJ.pdf&PHPSESSID=a2a6df631b237a47cba2b65d28d66705
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2009
  7. tanked_as_usual

    tanked_as_usual Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    4,981
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    keep up the good work, conspiracy theorists.......the real answer lies on the grassy knoll
     
  8. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,694
    Likes Received:
    565
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey


    Why don't you at least take the time to read the journal article before you post. Do you have any knowledge to explain the thermite ... no ... you don't. But you "Tanked" from the PoFo forum feel so inclined to debunk scientists ... classic thread title knee-jerk reaction posting.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009
  9. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,694
    Likes Received:
    565
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    [​IMG][​IMG]
    "Spheres formed during ignition of commercial thermite, with corresponding typical XDS spectrum"

    [​IMG][​IMG]
    "Spheres formed during ignition of red/gray chip in DSC, with corresponding typical XEDS spectrum

    [​IMG][​IMG]
    "Spheres extracted from WTC dust" and "XEDS spectrum from a sphere found in the WTC dust"
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009
  10. efin98

    efin98 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    As long there is any tiny shred of doubt, there will be conspiracy theorists whining about the "truth" :rolleyes:
     
  11. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Wait... please tell the forum why it's all nonsense.

    And when did a gaping cavern of conflicting testimony and suspicious evidence amount to "tiny shred?"... Just curious.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009
  12. Wildo7

    Wildo7 Totally Full of It

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,878
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ratings:
    +47 / 15 / -3

    This is what I don't get; you have a huge issue with "inside job/ controlled demolition" people being lumped in with the "they let it happen" crew and yet here you are jumping in the fray. The "truth" movement seems to be just a group that is supportive of any conspiracy theory. I'm not saying that there is definitely no merit to your suspicions, but I don't get how you can get pissed at truthers being lumped together, and then support the controlled demolition theories.
     
  13. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Excuse me? When did I support demolition theory? I asked a question for an "official story" coincidence theorist or two to flesh out their surface dismissal of 9/11 truth as a whole.

    Gear down.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009
  14. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,694
    Likes Received:
    565
    Ratings:
    +1,368 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    Did you know they only spent $600,000 on the investigation?

    I didn't think you did ... now you know.

    Did you ever read Senator Dayton's testimony ... I doubt it:

    Senator Dayton: I am just going to finish this if I may. Yet incredibly the NORAD commander did not pass that order to the fighter planes because he was "unsure how the pilots would or should proceed with this guidance." As you say Mr. Chairman, 'the situation is urgent' but we don't get protected in those circumstances but it's even worse when it's covered-up.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009
  15. efin98

    efin98 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Oh so they spent a good deal of money therefor it must be the truth...ok then :rolleyes:

    Whining about thermite now talking about fighter planes...

    Next up, it was the Martians...no wait it was the Venusians who did it :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009
  16. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    So, you can't answer my question. Noted.
     
  17. efin98

    efin98 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    No, I learned long ago not to argue with someone about this. Person will never listen to any reasoning or any logic or accept anything at face value.

    Arguing with you would be pointless, so I'm not going to. Take it as a "win", take it as not "accepting the truth", take it and shove it up your butt for all I care- I'm not going to argue it.
     
  18. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    LOL. What a response.

    I'm willing to listen to reason and logic.

    Please, tell the forum why a closer look into 9/11 overall is somehow not warranted, and why we should all just shut up....

    No tripe. Just the facts you feel you can present.
     
  19. efin98

    efin98 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Look into it overall= dig for more "facts" to prove conspiracy theories. Not going to do your research for you and not going to argue with people who don't want to see anything but their own ideals.
     
  20. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Interesting. So you make a claim that people revisiting 9/11 questions need to shut up, and when challenged on why you think that way, you punt to "you do the work yourself."

    This is sorta like defense attorney telling the judge and jury "My client is innocent!... But I don't need to present a case for him... You guys examine the evidence... You're dumb if you don't acquit him... I have nothing further, your Honor."

    There is no further research for me to do on the matter. I have, undoubtedly, lapped you in that field 20 times over regarding the facts of that day.

    My conclusion, based on everything I have read, leaves no doubt that the official story regarding what happened that day, and all that summer, is largely fraudulent. Anyone still assigning themselves to "coincidence theory" regarding 9/11 is certainly not using deductive reasoning, and probably believes the odds of flopping 10 flushes in a row is also quite plausible.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>