- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 14,100
- Reaction score
- 5,691
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.deeds said:On the bright side, all this morons picking Miami puts pressure on them. Their fans will believe this craps and if they struggle will be pissed.
I remember last year, someone said the Jets had the most talent in AFC, KC was going to the SB and Baltimore was a sure playoff team.
Don't let these guys bother you, the Pats will stay under the radar and will get the credit when they are winners once again!
Aqua4Ever04 said:The Patriots aren't under the radar because 90% of the analysts are still picking the Pats. I don't see why you guys erupt when just one "expert" picks the Fins. It's not like it's insane to think that way.
To the thread starter;
Maybe you just need to realize that the Pats aren't the only team in the NFL and there is a very good possibility the Pats don't win the East.
patsox23 said:Aqua, I don't think it's 90% at all, I've read more folks picking the dolphins than the Pats. But whatever. It's such a non-issue. Who cares? Let's just see who wins.
There's one part of your post I don't understand - the part that goes:"Maybe you just need to realize that the Pats aren't the only team in the NFL and there is a very good possibility the Pats don't win the East" - that part. What does that mean, exactly?Aqua4Ever04 said:The Patriots aren't under the radar because 90% of the analysts are still picking the Pats. I don't see why you guys erupt when just one "expert" picks the Fins. It's not like it's insane to think that way.
To the thread starter;
Maybe you just need to realize that the Pats aren't the only team in the NFL and there is a very good possibility the Pats don't win the East.
wistahpatsfan said:There's one part of your post I don't understand - the part that goes:"Maybe you just need to realize that the Pats aren't the only team in the NFL and there is a very good possibility the Pats don't win the East" - that part. What does that mean, exactly?
Aqua4Ever04 said:TE- New England has great depth and I really like Ben Watson. But I think McMichael is a top 10 TE in this league and I will give Miami a slight edge.
LB- First of all, when is Bruschi going to be in uniform? I'll take Thomas over Bruschi however and give Miami the slight advantage. Channing Crowder is going to be a star someday, you watch.
Aqua4Ever04 said:QB- If Culpepper returns to his 2004 form, I'll take him. Other wise, Brady is the obvious pick.
patsox23 said:You cannot be serious about TE. I like McMichael, too, but Ben Watson has the potential to be much better, and Daniel Graham is a far more complete TE. How you can even post what you just did and then give Miami the edge is BEYOND me.
As for "when is Bruschi going to be in uniform?" Word is - Sunday. I agree, by the way, that Crowder's a good one. I wanted BB to roll the dice on him, and was disappointed that he landed with the dolphins. Oh, Thomas over Bruschi? Maybe. But then there's Colvin and Vrabel. You don't have three as talented and PROVEN as those two.
Kasmir said:You'd really take Culpepper -- 2004 or not --over Brady? Who else -- besides Fins fans -- agrees with that?
The rest of your post was reasonable.
The miami o-line is going to suck, they are just plugging in guys.Aqua4Ever04 said:Slagathor,
I think that is a fair assesment, but let me have a crack at this.
QB- If Culpepper returns to his 2004 form, I'll take him. Other wise, Brady is the obvious pick. But there is no denying that Culpepper had one of the best seasons ever that year and I think he gets close to what he used to be.
RB- You asked if Ronnie can carry it 200 times, well he had 207 carries last year. I know it's not much but I think Ronnie can run it 325 times and do just fine. I will defintley take Miami's running backs.
WR- Miami by a land slide. The Patriots are bottom 10 in the league at the WR position and Miami is pretty good. Chambers is ready to become an elite reciever and Marty Booker is a solid #2.
TE- New England has great depth and I really like Ben Watson. But I think McMichael is a top 10 TE in this league and I will give Miami a slight edge.
OL- Patriots easy. But people over look the Miami line. Last year our running backs averaged 4.5 YPC and we allowed just 21 sacks. Pretty good numbers I think.
DL- Both are very good. I'm going to call this a tie because of our age. Taylor and Seymour are two of the best at DE. Miami is extremelly deep at DT.
LB- First of all, when is Bruschi going to be in uniform? I'll take Thomas over Bruschi however and give Miami the slight advantage. Channing Crowder is going to be a star someday, you watch.
DB- This is suppose to be Miami's weak spot, but I think it will suprise some people this year. The edge is still to New England, but I think Will Allen is ready to live up to his potential.
All in all, these teams are both very good and it should be a great year. Good luck to you guys this year. Although I hope you go 0-16, let's hope for an injury free great season.
Aqua4Ever04 said:DB- This is suppose to be Miami's weak spot, but I think it will suprise some people this year. The edge is still to New England, but I think Will Allen is ready to live up to his potential.
Aqua4Ever04 said:The Patriots aren't under the radar because 90% of the analysts are still picking the Pats. I don't see why you guys erupt when just one "expert" picks the Fins. It's not like it's insane to think that way.
To the thread starter;
Maybe you just need to realize that the Pats aren't the only team in the NFL and there is a very good possibility the Pats don't win the East.