Welcome to PatsFans.com

A more varied offense, better without Faulk?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by pdangle, Sep 23, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pdangle

    pdangle On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    443
    Likes Received:
    18
    Ratings:
    +36 / 1 / -0

    Offense better without Faulk?

    Probably not, but at least we'll end up with fewer plays from the shotgun. Who knows, it might even force BB to use a couple new formations from time to time on long yardage situations.

    Adjustments Coming Article
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  2. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,350
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +130 / 4 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    No question, you don't have to be Norman Einstien to see that
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  3. blackglass3

    blackglass3 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,801
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +57 / 0 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    We should have benchef Brady.
     
  4. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,350
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +130 / 4 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    That too...
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  5. cmasspatsfan

    cmasspatsfan In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Thats the title of the next thread Im waiting for :cool:

    God, I hope we blow out Buffalo this week, this board will become unreadable if we lose this game.
     
  6. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    17,206
    Likes Received:
    254
    Ratings:
    +831 / 12 / -2

    #12 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    The crazy thing is that this isn't even today's dumbest thread.
     
  7. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,465
    Likes Received:
    637
    Ratings:
    +1,855 / 31 / -48

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    PatsFans better without pdangle?
     
  8. LuthierJr

    LuthierJr Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    723
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    QFT....

    But it's close.
     
  9. pdangle

    pdangle On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    443
    Likes Received:
    18
    Ratings:
    +36 / 1 / -0

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Yeah it's a silver lining reaction thing I guess. But if I'm playing D and the Pats keep the status quo on 3rd in 8, I'd be happy knowing i've already seen it a thousand times on film. Only this time it will most likely be performed less effectviely.

    Might as well try something different. Something that better suits the tried and tested personnel you have on the roster. But I'm sure BB will just plug someone in and keep going.

    -----

    Or... KmonotonouS maybe $%^@ my *#!%? Would the world then be a better place? Maybe nuzzle it and fall asleep as you dream of your next enlightening post. Such as OT: Boise State vs. Virginia Tech. Well done :woohoo:

    Also have any of you faulkers ever heard of an attention grabbing headline? Sheesh, calm the faulk down. Y'all even more grumpy than me, and I might of beat my GF with a sneaker last night, as far as I recall.

    Let me rephrase the title to "Is it possible that the offense's expected changes due to the fact Faulk is injured, lead to some unexpected success?"

    Does that make it all better for you muttonheads? If not, $%^# it! :enranged:
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  10. blackglass3

    blackglass3 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,801
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +57 / 0 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    These threads are making me laugh during class. Thanks guys!
     
  11. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,465
    Likes Received:
    637
    Ratings:
    +1,855 / 31 / -48

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Faulk, is, was, and has been, the biggest beast on this team not named Wes Welker on third downs for us throughout the vast majority of his career here. He's great at blocking, great at getting open, great at catching the ball in tight spots, and great at getting his toes in bounds. He can also take handoffs in draw play situations and get the yardage for first down. ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT, he's one of the biggest locker room leaders on this entire team.

    Is the offense better without Faulk? No, it's not. Time to close this thread down now.
     
  12. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,350
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +130 / 4 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Your suppose to be paying attention, not F ing off on pats fans. When you graduate and get a job Then you can do that. :D
     
  13. The Brandon Five

    The Brandon Five Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    6,576
    Likes Received:
    71
    Ratings:
    +224 / 0 / -4

    #75 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    It's still early.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. PATSYLICIOUS

    PATSYLICIOUS Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,076
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +89 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Bench Brady, Offense is better without Faulk. I can't wait to see what you lunatics are gonna say next
     
  15. blackglass3

    blackglass3 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,801
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +57 / 0 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Nah, it's just a week long "Implementing Network Security" class. Sort of a beefed up Security+.

    Graduate and get a job? Pffft. I joined the Air Force 14 years ago to avoid college. :)
     
  16. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    17,206
    Likes Received:
    254
    Ratings:
    +831 / 12 / -2

    #12 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    No kidding; by the time the day's over this might not even be in the top 5
     
  17. pdangle

    pdangle On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    443
    Likes Received:
    18
    Ratings:
    +36 / 1 / -0

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    So all you lemmings are just ready to concede that it isn't possible that the offense's expected changes due to the fact Faulk is injured, might lead to some unexpected success?

    Of course, it's not better overall this week or next probably. But maybe we surprise ourselves. But I guess not. You're all right again. Boy K and everyone here is taking the loss of K. Faulk pretty hard. Too soon?

    And please, stop saying "Trade Brady" fools.
     
  18. PATSNUTme

    PATSNUTme Paranoid Homer Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    15,275
    Likes Received:
    88
    Ratings:
    +183 / 2 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Someday I'll not be a moderator and then I can contribute my true thoughts on some of these threads. Until then,
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  19. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    17,206
    Likes Received:
    254
    Ratings:
    +831 / 12 / -2

    #12 Jersey

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    Even with your efforts to move the goalposts, the answer's still no. Keep backtracking, though; you might eventually find your way to some common sense.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  20. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    9,203
    Likes Received:
    124
    Ratings:
    +295 / 1 / -2

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Offense better without Faulk?

    This might explain things:

    * Full moon calendar 2010 *

    I'm tempted to start a thread with a poll on the craziest thread of the day.

    Also -- wasn't there once a requirement that members have 100 posts to start a thread?
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>