Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by mikey, Jan 5, 2006.
... and 125 civilians.
It's hard to imagine how this war will end in anything other than a very long period of violence, which keeps Iraq weak while Iran grows strong. Bush's war-by-mistake is not only killing many people, its endangering international stability and creating a terrorist movement that is growing larger and increasingly sophisticated.
Corrrection- 11 GIs died yesterday, not 5.
Waiting for Zuma and than we have the whole terrorist cheerleading squad together.
Does that make guys twice as happy?
No one's happy when soldiers die, but Democrats and liberals want to do something about it, while Republicans want to stick to the strategy that keeps us in this mess.
Makes me twice as angry. Twice as many died for a lie.
Stay the course, right?
You tell me - you're the one that supported sending them over there to die.
Black Sabbath said it best:
No!!!! They are eye candy, we can't send them. Besides, that would increase the national employment roll by 2, and as everyone knows, the hate america crowd hates rising employment.
Would someone please give a coherent reason why one more of our best kids should die for this backward, medieval, lazy, useless crowd of flesh called Iraq? The men won't fight for their families but we should? They don't deserve ANYTHING from us. Anything we provide for them - peace, law, stability, "democracy", F-150's, rap videos - will evaporate at the rate of the withdrawall of every last American there. Screw that s--thole!
I've got one good reason. 20% of the worlds oil reserves.
The difference is WPF's argument is more realistic than any of the Saddam sympathizing crap you have spewed.
And your buddies the Kennedy's and Kerry's :bricks:
Separate names with a comma.