VrabelJr
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 8,106
- Reaction score
- 7,710
Why? That's who he'd be replacing.
Drafting is not as simple as replacing player A with player B. That is incredibly shortsighted.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Why? That's who he'd be replacing.
Drafting is not as simple as replacing player A with player B. That is incredibly shortsighted.
And yet it's an important measure in the Patriots scouting a player - who on the roster will he replace?
Almost every pro to amateur draftnik has Barron comfortably rated as a first round pick. He'd replace the weakest link on our defense (and be a considerable upgrade) and he's perfectly suited for the Pats in terms of character and coaching, was far better than Robert Lester at pass defense last year and was an all-american safety. What am I not seeing?
I'm not going to mock a draft, but here's a few guys I'm interested in (IF they're availble)
Pass Rushers
1st/2nd round- Whitney Mercilus, Donta' Hightower, and Andre Branch. Vinny Curry also somewhat intrigues me.
Corners/Safeties-
1st round-Alfonzo Denard, Stephen Gilmore, Mark Barron
2nd-Chase Minnifield, Leonard Johnson
WR-1st round- I was going to say Kendall Wright but his stock is rising so odds are we won't be able to go anywhere near him. Alshon Jeffrey (Iffy though, I heard he could become another Mike Williams) Mohamad Sanu
2nd round- Nick Toon, Marvin McNutt, and Joe Adams
Upside. The first round is where you take a pass rusher who runs a 4.55, not a safety who does.
We've taken a lot of those have we? At the back end of the first, Patriots historically take players like Brandon Meriweather and Laurence Maroney. I'm going to respectfully suggest that Barron has better upside than either of them right now.
I'm not denying that he's a safe pick. That's exactly what he is. But you don't draft "safe but flawed" in the first round. The first round is where you find your 10-year starters, not a guy who can start immediately due to lack of talent on the roster, but is ideally a backup at another position.
No point in drafting Mark Barron just because he's the best safety in a class of garbage safeties. Plus his skillset is almost identical to Chung's. There's four pretty good FA safeties available in Goldson, Branch, Nelson, and Griffin.
Barron isn't even the same type of safety as Reed and Berry. Those guys are field generals and ball hawks. Hell, Berry can run with WRs. Barron on the other hand is a SS with Pat Angerer's speed but less size.
Pat Angerer ran a 4.71 at the combine and a 4.64 at his Pro Day.
Barron is projected to run a 4.56, at worst. If he runs better than that, great.
That's the thing. He can't run better than that. He won't be able to work out until after the draft. He's going to be drafted without being able to answer any questions about his speed.
I did some research, and the slowest safety to go in the first round in the last decade was Roy Williams. He ran a 4.53, and is as pure of a SS as it gets. Sean Taylor was the second slowest at 4.51, but he had just about everything else going for him. Everyone else in the first round broke 4.5. Since 2004, no safety has gone in the first round without running 4.48 or faster. Quite a few of the first round safeties have run in the 4.3s, including the last two (Berry and Thomas)
The only "top" guy I have any interest in is Dashon Goldson,
Barron is listed by many draftniks as a Ballhawk and field general, contrary to your comments.
The big issue I see on Barron is that he fails to wrap up at times and misses open field tackles. That is more important for the left safety/right safety the Pats play.
Harrison Smith is better than this guy. Smith is a great open field tackler, he doesnt go for the highlight hit, he wraps up his target who then immediately falls to the ground.
Harrison Smith vs Stanford and Miami - YouTube
He's also a great pass rusher, vs Stanford he forced Luck to throw an INT just before hitting him.
Why would you watch highlights?
Who doesn't like watching videos of Cox?