PaulNEPats
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Messages
- 2,474
- Reaction score
- 1,215
In terms of production last season, Fitzgerald wasn't exactly head-and-shoulders above Welker.
That's because he missed 3-4 games due to injury
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.In terms of production last season, Fitzgerald wasn't exactly head-and-shoulders above Welker.
That's because he missed 3-4 games due to injury
The people that are arguing against this are either: A. Complete ******s, or B. Have never seen Welker play.
I am neither a ****** (though my exwife might disgree), nor have I not seen Welker play. What I am is a believer in NOT overpaying. If we are going to pay that much, I rather get the better receiver, and in my opinion, I think Stallworth is the better receiver. Just my opinion, but apparently opinions disagreeing with the Patrots FO moves make you ******ed. At least I know the cause of my mental handicap.
I am neither a ****** (though my exwife might disgree), nor have I not seen Welker play. What I am is a believer in NOT overpaying. If we are going to pay that much, I rather get the better receiver, and in my opinion, I think Stallworth is the better receiver. Just my opinion, but apparently opinions disagreeing with the Patrots FO moves make you ******ed. At least I know the cause of my mental handicap.
I am neither a ****** (though my exwife might disgree), nor have I not seen Welker play. What I am is a believer in NOT overpaying. If we are going to pay that much, I rather get the better receiver, and in my opinion, I think Stallworth is the better receiver. Just my opinion, but apparently opinions disagreeing with the Patrots FO moves make you ******ed. At least I know the cause of my mental handicap.
I am neither a ****** (though my exwife might disgree), nor have I not seen Welker play. What I am is a believer in NOT overpaying. If we are going to pay that much, I rather get the better receiver, and in my opinion, I think Stallworth is the better receiver. Just my opinion, but apparently opinions disagreeing with the Patrots FO moves make you ******ed. At least I know the cause of my mental handicap.
I'm all aboard for the Thomas, Brady & Morris moves (especially the Thomas move), but 5.5mill for Wes Welker, plus we give up a second round pick ? To me, that's a bad move.
Don't get me wrong, I love his heart, I love his versatility, but really, all he is, is a replacement for Troy Brown's versatility. Certainly not a #1 receiver type. 5.5mill and a #2 pick for a #3 receiver is just wayyyyyyy toooooo much. I like the kid, but we really need a replacement for Deion Branch, not a #3 or #4 receiver.
I much rather the Pats would have spent some free agency money on Donte Stallworth, a perfect replacement for Deion Branch, or a #2 receiver at worst case scenerio. If we wanted a Welker type, Bradon Stokely is available (cheaper and without giving up a #2 pick).
I really don't like this move, and since it's such a high offer, no way do the Dolphins match this. Wes Welker is a Patriot, not my favorite move, but I guess I have to accept it. We really need to stock up on some more receivers (need a #1 or #2 type, Welker, Gaffney, Caldwell & all our other WR's are #3's), linebackers, and defensive backs. Hopefully Jarrett or Ginn are on the Pats next year, as well as Willis or Poslunsky are on the Pats.
Good post. I agree with you. That said, I think he will contribute.
By your own admission, you've never seen Welker play. So you look a little suspect when you say Stallworth his better?
What is this based on? Sportscenter highlights? Madden ratings? I'm not trying to be a wise ass, it just seems odd to be able to say one is better than the other without knowledge of one of them.
It's like if I've never seen the Departed, but I can say that Goodfellas is better than the Departed.
Maybe I should have worded this better, "nor have I not seen Welker play". Please read it again, it's kind of a double negative, it basically means, I HAVE seen Welker play. The Nor+Not can be very confusing, my apologies. That being said, I've seen Welker play many times, and have said several times in other threads, I LOVE his passion, and his return ability, but not the price. Sorry that I disagree with most of you, but it's my opinion.
P.S.-I've seen The Departed, and it no Goodfellas, lol. A good movie nonetheless though. IMO Goodfellas is in a league of its own, just behind The Godfather.
Why do we need Stallworth? HEZ FASTT!!1 That's about it. We don't need someone to get open downfield. That's NOT WHAT THE PATS' OFFENSE IS ALL ABOUT. Our offense throws short (with Brady taking a typical three step drop) and over the middle while pounding the ball up the middle to open up said pass. We systematically drive down the field. And we have never had a burner in the past five years (Branch wasn't a burner) but still managed to get it done. Welker fits the mold of a Patriot perfectly.