I suspect that Seymour would still be here, franchised. A transition tag would ahve been put on WIlfork until his contract was complete.
We would have a better team in 2009 and 2010.
Rob0729 said:
I thought Pioli was going to make Cassel play for the franchise tender myself. Personally, I thought that was the best way to go. In hindsight, it was. They could have resigned him for far less than he got this year.
I suspect you're both wrong. I suspect the decision not to extend Seymour had been made by the end of 2007 and when the opportunity to trade him for what would likely amount to a top 5 1st in a capped draft presented itself in 2009 Pioli would have been all over it too. Remember he traded for a QB and then traded away his aging HOF TE... It was on his watch that Branch didn't get extended and got flipped for a first on the eve of a season and on his watch that they kept insulting Asante with sub top 5 offers and then tagged him non exclusive and probably would have (and arguably should have) traded him had anyone nibbled. His Chiefs have one of the 5 lowest payrolls in the league to date for 2010, roughly $40M below the 2009 floor I believe I just read...
And the decision to extend Wilfork had already been made, but they wanted to gauge the market for NT as well as for guys like Peppers and Boldin before they committed to contract terms with Vince because even with $40 parking their cash flow is limited. Absent compensation he'd have been made an offer he couldn't refuse and we couldn't match before we had a chance to apologize. And Seymour would have been gone either way because we weren't paying him $12M long or short term and no one else was going to bite on a tag and trade for the priviledge.
Scott hit on some tremendous talents and values in his stint as player personnel director here. He also swung and missed increasingly. That was his job, identify talent for the system. Bill of course developed the system and scheme and coached it, in addition to signing off on Scott doing the job Bill essentially taught him...how to scout talent for the system and manage a salary cap.
I think Scott is a bright guy and a great guy to work with. I'm not sure he will succeed absent Belichick at the helm. I don't believe Haley is the guy for the job, I think he really wanted Firenz, I hope bringing Charlie and RAC into the mix will mitigate that for Scott and Matt's sake.
As for Cassel, his deal is cap friendly going forward, and they had cap room to burn in 2009(in fact they struggled to make the floor last year too) so it made way more sense to get his long term deal done and let the TV networks pay for it... The alternative was to face another tag this season or to draft a rookie QB last season with their #1 pick and pay him Stafford (6/$72M) or Sanchez (5/$50-$60M) money... Comparatively speaking Cassel was a bargain once extended. This year they would have had to tag him again and hope Josh didn't swoop in. And with $30M in the bank Matt could have still been available to Josh come 2011...
Like I said, Scott is a bright guy. Just like the guy who just traded for Brady Quinn for a bag of balls... the only one who has strayed off script is Dimetroff, and he was in a rather unique situation since he didn't have access to much if any system help and he was in a situation that wasn't going to allow much leeway for anything short of a turnaround on the fly and a new face for the franchise. So he had to adapt and decided to gambled his #1 on a fairly cerebral kid as it is...
That's another reason why I chuckle when every once and a while someone claims that NE must have wanted that Raiders 2011 pick to draft their next QB...LOL