Q. Do you think that we are well stocked for the future at the wide receiver position? How much can we expect from
Taylor Price? I know he is talented, but does he have the potential to be a replacement for Randy Moss?
A. I don't see Price as a speed guy in the Moss-type mold. He reminds me more of a David Givens style of receiver -- physical and fast, but not necessarily a straight-line burner. When I think of players who would be most affected by a potential lockout, he's one of the top ones on the list because I think
another full offseason in the system is crucial for his development. As for if the Patriots are well stocked at receiver, I think they are. I do wonder if they have
too much of the same type of receiver.
Q. Hello Mike, do you see the Pats trying to get a
deeper threat at WR just to boost the aerial assault down the field? I'm not even really sure who the potential free agents are.
A. I
don't see it being as high of a priority as other areas, such as the offensive line, defensive line and pass rush, so I see any possible addition would be based on the opportunity available. If a top talent becomes available, maybe it moves them in that direction. As for possible free agents, student assistant Mike Rodak put together an
informative capsule detailing the position and some of the options.
Q. It seems there is a good chance
Steve Smith is available from Carolina. I would think the Patriots should go after him and not worry about Price/Tate developing since you would have a Pro Bowl receiver instead. Your thoughts?
A.
If Smith is available, I'd strongly consider it even though I don't view it as a top need. I think Smith is
a top competitor who could thrive with Tom Brady throwing him the ball. A big question would be the cost to acquire him, but the possibility is intriguing.
Q. What are the chances
Randy Moss signs with the Patriots?
A. I've thought in the past that if Moss takes the 2007-type approach, it has a slight chance of happening. But I think
it would be a longer shot. I'd estimate 10 percent.
Q. Mike, dare to give a
Larry Fitzgerald-to-NE scenario another thought? The Cardinals need to rebuild and lack a competent QB, so getting rid of Fitzgerald while they can redeem a few picks seems to be a no-brainer. Plus, the Pats have the picks/cap space and a need for a home-run WR. I know they address needs more through draft than free agency, but LF is only 27 with incredible upside. Is this really too crazy to unfold?
A. I think it's too crazy. Fitzgerald is one of their best players, if not the best, and
I just don't see them giving him away. If you're a Cardinals fan, Fitzgerald is one of the few players you can get really excited about right now. Trade him away and I think it's a bad business decision for them, not to mention a bad football decision.