Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,293
- Reaction score
- 3,986
The teams at 13 and 15 definitely need QBs. The teams at 11, 14, and 17 might need QBs.
We're at 7. The Ravens at 8 need a QB. #7 pick salary for a QB isn't ridiculous. I see the heart of a trade down here.
For a QB, it also isn't ridiculous to get the full value on the trade value chart or better.
By the trade value chart, we're in the range of 1st + 2nd for 1st at #13 or #15. If it's #11, it's more like 1st + 2nd for 1st + 2nd (or the Oakland high 3rd).
I'd be happy to include late picks in such a trade, or to offer our late 2nd in return for a next-year 2nd as part of a deal.
It seems likely that there will be good value at positions of need around there too, including CB. And note that #15 is a very sweet spot, because you now get one more year on the guy's contract than you get at 16+.
We're at 7. The Ravens at 8 need a QB. #7 pick salary for a QB isn't ridiculous. I see the heart of a trade down here.
For a QB, it also isn't ridiculous to get the full value on the trade value chart or better.
By the trade value chart, we're in the range of 1st + 2nd for 1st at #13 or #15. If it's #11, it's more like 1st + 2nd for 1st + 2nd (or the Oakland high 3rd).
I'd be happy to include late picks in such a trade, or to offer our late 2nd in return for a next-year 2nd as part of a deal.
It seems likely that there will be good value at positions of need around there too, including CB. And note that #15 is a very sweet spot, because you now get one more year on the guy's contract than you get at 16+.