Welcome to PatsFans.com

10 questionable for Mon night

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Mack Herron, Sep 28, 2007.

  1. Mack Herron

    Mack Herron Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    30
    Ratings:
    +77 / 0 / -2

    #24 Jersey

    OLB Rosevelt Colvin (ankle)
    CB Randall Gay (thigh)
    RB Laurence Maroney (groin)
    G Stephen Neal (shoulder)
    WR Donte' Stallworth (knee)
    WR Kelley Washington (hamstring)
    NT Vince Wilfork (shoulder)
    S Eugene Wilson (ankle)
    DE Mike Wright (knee)
    G Billy Yates (shoulder)


    http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/reiss_pieces/

    Faulk is probable as is, of course, Brady.
  2. patsox23

    patsox23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,387
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +9 / 1 / -0

    means less than nothing. We're healthy and ready to go. Maybe Yates, Washington and Mike Wright don't play. Otherwise, we're fine.
  3. JoePats

    JoePats Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Still rather have them not listed.
  4. Flying Fungi

    Flying Fungi Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,416
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0


    I'm amazed that anyone who considers themselves a Patriots fan is ever putting any weight into the injury reports.
  5. PatsFan37

    PatsFan37 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,508
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #37 Jersey

    I'll tell you why it worries me. At one point when people were complaining that Belichick manipulates the injury reports, someone tallied a year of reports and determined that those he listed as questionable didn't play 50% of the time.

    More than half the players on the list are regular contributors.

    OTOH, the Bengals don't have Rudy, so I'm not sure it matters.
  6. JoePats

    JoePats Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I'm a pessimist. While they don't mean a lot it's not like he's making them up. Relax.
  7. Mike the Brit

    Mike the Brit Minuteman Target PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,629
    Likes Received:
    115
    Ratings:
    +223 / 2 / -0

    Disable Jersey

    Mmm ... yes, I take your point. But it's at least arguable that there has been an important change.

    Recently, it's been pointed out that to list a player as probable means that it is "virtually certain" that he will play. (The increasingly asinine Florio asserted that, if a player who was listed as probable did not play, the club would be in violation of league rules. But that seems so stupid that not even the NFL would try to enforce it. Nevertheless, the idea that the probability is over 75% seems to have taken hold.)

    So, if that's the case, what is BB to do if he has a player who is likely to play but not "virtually certain" (and if he's not reluctant to make the league look ridiculous)? Edit Oops! Noticed that Brady is listed as probable so scrap claim that he is not on the list. But still, I think that we can say that, at this stage, he is "virtually certain".

    If you need encouragement, that's something to hang on to.
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2007
  8. PatsFan37

    PatsFan37 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,508
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #37 Jersey

    Right, not thinking about Brady. Thinking about Colvin, Maroney, Wilfork, Wilson. Also not worried so much about this game, but the trend. Worried is probably too strong a word. Virtually certain that I'm not worried. Unless you find that questionable.
  9. Mike the Brit

    Mike the Brit Minuteman Target PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,629
    Likes Received:
    115
    Ratings:
    +223 / 2 / -0

    Disable Jersey

    Yes, Wilfork would be huge. I mean, he is huge -- huge if he's there and huge if he's not. Losing the others would be pretty bad too.
  10. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Not worried...concerned more in the Yates/Neal situation..both out might be a problem for a backup...4th interior lineman..meaning they might have to move Kzczur inside.. Wilfork is a concern as there is a big falloff to a backup...Colvin?? Wilson? Maroney? I think they'll play..
  11. Patriot_in_NY

    Patriot_in_NY Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,525
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    I think that of those on the list, these 4 will play. Just my feeling, but I think they understand the importance of defense in this game, and I'd be surprised to see them out. Maroney too. These guys could gash Cinci for some serious runs, I'd be suprised that he not get the opportunity if he can.

    Puit another way, if any of these 4 DON'T play, I am immediatly worried about availibility over then next 2-3 weeks.

    Less concerned in this game then I might be in others. Cinci has not pressured real well this year. If these guys need a week, then I still think we could manage fine cobbling another strong wall with a back up.
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2007
  12. jbb9s

    jbb9s Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,160
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Well because a few of the guys on that list missed considerable time over the last 2 years and they are starting to become reputable as injury prone.
  13. NovaScotiaPatsFan

    NovaScotiaPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,051
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    Has anyone heard the status of Tom Brady's shoulder? Probable means there's only a 75% chance he'll play! We're DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!
  14. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    I don't think Wilson is on the list...removed...or so I saw on the web site...9 then......Wilson was on it earlier..Wed I believe..but hasn't been since...
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2007

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>