Wow, weren't you one of the guys going all nuts about what you THOUGHT were bad calls in Super Bowl XL? No debate, just screaming bloody murder without trial!
But now -- even with the Patriots being PROVEN guilty of violating anti-cheating rules -- you want to get all "rational" and stuff...
Ah, little difference. Nobody ever proved those 5 Lombardis had anything to do with steroids. Unlike the Patriots, who were PROVEN guilty by hard, confiscated evidence.
Your imagination versus my facts. Sorry, you lose.
Re: Sports Illustrated on how video scam helped beat the Jets last playoffs
Again I have to ask -- how does anything that happened in Super Bowl XL even come close to this kind of scam? And yet you were all so outraged back then, calling for the ref's head, demanding the commissioner do...
Sports Illustrated on how video scam helped beat the Jets last playoffs
"What it does," said our ex-Patriots source, "is give the other team extra work, and as I said, that creates a playing field that's not level for both teams."
The Jets beat the Patriots with an exotic blitz package in...
Well gosh, we were all cloak and dagger after Super Bowl XL weren't we? Back then, any conspiracy against the poor innocent Seahawks was to believed. It was all fixed and stuff... get on your tinfoil hat, whoo!
But now -- all this cheating talk is just totally science fiction? I mean, what...
Well gosh, you all sure were quick to condemn the league and the refs after Super Bowl XL. Back then there was no such thing as "guilty until proven innocent" it was just all "I know they cheated... just because!" around here.
And let's go get the guilty bastidges!
My how times have changed.
Re: PFT -"Is Brady Tarnished too?"
Wait -- you actually believe this and I'm the one who's a "******"?
No, the Patriots are on the hook for a lot more than just "having" a video camera. It's what you guys amazingly don't get -- or don't want to get.
If it's "100% allowed" then why are...
It's amazing how you guys screamed bloody murder over SUPPOSED blown refs calls in Super Bowl XL... but don't think anything's wrong with PROVEN cheating in the case of the Patriots.
Back then it was all about "tarnished wins" and stuff. But suddenly that concept doesn't exist now.
Now...
Re: PFT -"Is Brady Tarnished too?"
If it's discovered that the Pats' had been stealing defensive signals, why WOULDN'T Brady's skills come into question?
What QB couldn't look great if he was being given plays based on advance knowledge of what the defense was going to do? What are you...
So when WE cheat, it's "genius." But when we think other teams get the benefit of calls or something, we stage a week-long whinefest to protest the "injustice" of it all.
I see how it works.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.