Search results

Gronk's broken bones were clearly due to a lack of bone density due to a lack of strengthening work.

They aren't really making an effort to tackle, the primary objective is stripping the football - this is obvious when you watch tape of all the games. The 'poor tackling' yesterday was a result of this and the ability of the Bills' skill players.

No such thing as should we didn't make enough plays to be anything better than 6-3.

statistically speaking we do pretty well against #1 WRs... and johnson is banged up.

Looks good to me.

I'll be checking this on wednesday but my gut instinct is that it wasn't overly respected.

It was obviously the right call to make for the reasons you stated; but then I thought that was obvious at the time?

I don't think it's the 3-3 record that has people concerned chap.

Alfonzo is a rookie give the coaches time and we'll be seeing yellow whenever the ball is thrown his way.

That 46 yard bomb was just as much on whoever decided a 43 base cover 2 was a good coverage call in that situation.

He isn't admitting homophobia it's a joke. People are way too uptight.

Branch isn't going to have any 100 yard games, probably no 50 yard games. What he will have, in my opinion, is one catch that extends a drive and maintains momentum.

I've not overly analysed Tavon's play yet but what I have seen on the all 22 is that on short-intermediate patterns he generally makes good decisions. When the route patterns trend to the deeper side his decision making isn't as good and he seems to hesitate at times. I don't think he's ready...