Search results

After last night's game, I've decided to turn over a new leaf. You guys were correct in a few things. Yes i'm a Colts fan, and a bitter one at that. I am obsessed with Spygate, umong other football things. I talked so much about Spygate because of the response I got from the Patriot nation and...

Ahhha. Got me. This comes as little surprise. Why say i'm a Vikings fan? Simple, why get a bunch of Pats fans even more mad at my team or give my team a bad reputation. And yes, i'm well aware what i'm doing is giving myself, and my team a poor reputation. So why do that? You could try to...

Saw this last night and found it pretty funny, check it out... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9UxQNKoAGw

I ask this question to all of the Patriots fans. I'm not looking to chime in with my opinion, I simply want your honest ones. So here it goes... How much of an advantage (if any) do you feel the Patriots recieved from their videotaping procedure? On average, what effect per game do you think...

Just wanted to wish everyone on the board a happy halloween. Hope you all have a great night. :-)

nope, afraid not

I understand what your saying but sometimes we have to use common sense to learn the obvious even if you don't have 100% proof in front of your eyes. Almost nothing can be proven without a shadow of a doubt, that does not mean that it didnt happen. So using common sense and deductive reasoning...

The author was correct. Belichick did knowingly cheat, the rules were clear, anyone especially him could understand them. If you chose to believe the word of a liar in regards to not using it during the game, fine. Although every answer might not come to light, your certain not to get honestly...

Actually based off of facts, proof, and admission. If you want to have it outlined better, visit the link I gave in the other post.

None of this changes the fact that they analyze the siganls, and feed them to Brady before the plays start.

So basically you have not responded to the last statemet i made about no one respnding to the originals post.

No one said stealing signals against Wannstedt helped against Sban, stealing signals against Saban helped against Saban. Knowing the plays before they come, getting that info thru illegal means, etc.

And he was correct in that stealing signals is against the rules.

238 + views of this post and 0 pats fans replying to the link that was the topic of the post, now that speaks volumes.

Sorry mate, when it comes to cheating its the accusers job to find proof someone did something not the other way around. Just because the Patriots were the only team to cheat like this does not mean its the job of all other 31 teams to prove they have not. How would you prove you havent cheated...

So you are taking Matt Walsh's word now? Problem is the Pats very much used the tapes during the game, and then knew the plays before they came.

It's difficult but a fan must be loyal despite their teams record, not be a bandwagon jumper to a team that is a proven winner. But in all fairness, without cheating, The Patriots have not won any Super Bowls either. They did become AFC champions twice without cheating which is impressive...

All you did was branch a tree off of one coach who said he cheated. So you assume that the coach he learned from did it and taught it with zero proof, then later assume that it spread like a virus to countless coaches? Problem here is zero proof. It's a theory with no foundation.

True, but my team made it to 4 super bowls without cheating, your team only made it to 2 without cheating.