Re: ESPN's Mike Fish .. WOW .. "Further Indict"
Lol aight buddy. I do recall BB saying it was defensive signals, as does the rest of the world.
And you can't expect fair reporting... ever, in the modern era. plus, it sound more like you're falling victim to confirmation bias.
Actually, I...
Re: ESPN's Mike Fish .. WOW .. "Further Indict"
Well now there's offensive evidence and proof that it dates back 8 years. That's certainly a new development.
And there you go looking for deflection again. Lol.
I think most peoples' priorities are bigger in scope... like questions about...
You're always gonna have the ridiculous group of people screaming "OMGZ CHEATERZZZ BRADY SUCKSSSSSS"
And you're also gonna have the reasonable dissent of "every sb win was only 3 points, same with the loss... hmmMMMMMMMMmmmmmm... I wonder..."
And you're also gonna have the "WHATEVER WE BEAT...
Re: ESPN's Mike Fish .. WOW .. "Further Indict"
Lol. I enjoy the "deflect the truth" strategy that so many of us fans like to use. Honestly it's tough for me to keep supporting this team, faced with all this evidence. I know homers will be homers, and I'm not gonna abandon the team, but...
Them and the rest of the country's football fans whose blood is boiling and whose mouths are watering at the prospect of additional punishment.
(esp divisonal opponent, steelers, and chargers fans)
Honestly it'd be ludicrous for the media to not jump all over this, that's what the media does.
Re: McGinest on NFLN , talks a bit about spygate also
I just think I should add, the next year we were pretty damn good. I'm guessing it takes time to digest the relationships between signals, down and distance, formations, and motion. All of a sudden, our sub-par corners played like...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.