I agree with that, the Pats more than likely do not win a superbowl that year, without him.
I was about to say that too, I had to browse through the last 4 freaking pages, all about everything but training camp which is what this thread...
That is the hope.
Interest as an analyst?
Or he was just better than Cunningham and Francis, which is very probable.
Holland should beat Argentina, I would say, from the way they have played, Netherland is a fun team to watch, other than Robben who really makes it...
very true, which is why Reiss assertion is not that far off base.
Or maybe the Brady from back then wouldn't force the throw?
It is not that bad, I think it will grow on me more.
The Swiss must have forgotten that there was a game today.
And Gronk will probably start on PUP.
QB (3) Brady, Mallett, Garoppolo
RB (4) Ridley, Vereen, White, Finch
WR (7) Edelman, Amendola, Dobson, Thompkins, LaFell, Boyce, Slater
Hasn't it been said that centers and guards do not get drafted high? Usually mid round pics?
Didn't koppen start his rookie year?
Maybe the Pats think the investment they made in the WR corp is ready to payoff and they felt they didn't need to invest high there for this draft...
Along with a second and fourth round draft pick during that time period.
What if Brady doesn't go into a steep decline, but when Brady does retire this guy become the next best QB in the league, is it still a wasted pick?
Is it possible in BBs mind one way or the other Brady only has two more season as the Pats qb?
I'm very happy with the positions drafted, I don't know enough about evaluating talent to know whether those players were the best at their positions...
Separate names with a comma.