I'm having trouble reconciling these two statements.
That's one hell of a statistic and should be a major cause of concern.
Not so sure about that. Petersonless Vikings don't count (especially having deactivated him the day before). Bengals were down 20-3 & 34-10 before...
Nothing controversial about your statement that merits any negative reaction. Only argumentative posters would take issue with such an innocuous post.
They may or they may not come back to win this game. Either outcome has no relevance to the long term prospects of this season. They are not a good...
can we at last get f---ing 15 yards here to get a chance to tie the game?
If not for those three turnovers this would be real bad. I mean score wise.
WTF is wrong w/ Miami? WTF would you pass it there when the Pats D couldn't stop a good high school team running attack right now?
Top 10 D? Not yet, not by a long shot.
The "Revis of old" had problems with no mortal man.
I would like a PM, thanks!
Separate names with a comma.