New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Dont'a Hightower off the edge? (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/974189-donta-hightower-off-edge.html)

1%er 11-27-2012 04:36 PM

Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
Couple of questions/thoughts..

1. Do you think we will see Hightower rushing for a OLB/DE position at all to fill the Cunningham void?

2. Why haven't we seen more of him so far? He seem rather successful in college as an edge rusher in sub packages and in his limited opportunities as a blitzer this year he has gotten pressure.

My thought is that they were allowing him to adjust to the NFL and the responsibilities of a LB and now as he moves forward we could see it. I just think it would be nice to keep him, Mayo, Spikes, Jones, Ninkovich and Wilfork all on the field for all 3 downs as often as possible.

Imagine the versatility of Wilfork, Jones at DT, Ninkovich at RE, Hightower at LE and Spikes, Mayo at LB in a sub package? Plus I think Jones could dominate up the middle in that package.

Joey007 11-27-2012 04:47 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
I'd love to see Hightower off the edge. He has produced 3 sacks this season, and we could certainly use him with Cunningham gone and Jones hobbled for sure. When we initially drafted him that's what I loved about Hightower was he was a guy who was supposed to be able to come off the edge as well. Just an all-around linebacker.

I say put him on the edge and let him get to work.

Elijah 11-27-2012 04:47 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
Hightower is not an OLB/DE. He's a pure linebacker, whether it be OLB/MLB in the 4-3 or ILB in the 3-4. I don't get why people think he could play DE. From what I've heard, he didn't do that much at Alabama and when he did, it wasn't that great. He has gotten pressure from the inside this year, so why not just keep that going?

Shockt327 11-27-2012 04:48 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
Thank you!

I've been wanting to see Hightower being worked in as an edge rusher for a while now. I'm not asking for a total change of position. I honestly think you need a quality rotation at DE/OLB.

So, When we play out of a true 3-4 alignment; Hightower will play off the edge. You see it for a few snaps every game. I remember one play against Tenn where he took on the RT, drove him back, and slammed into the lead blocker and it lead to the tackle of the RB. The guy is a beast.

1%er 11-27-2012 04:52 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elijah (Post 3261551)
Hightower is not an OLB/DE. He's a pure linebacker, whether it be OLB/MLB in the 4-3 or ILB in the 3-4. I don't get why people think he could play DE. From what I've heard, he didn't do that much at Alabama and when he did, it wasn't that great. He has gotten pressure from the inside this year, so why not just keep that going?

Elijah he played DE in college frequently. That leads "people" and I to believe he could do so in a sub package in the NFL. 6'3 270lb guys with speed and power tend to be good in pass rush. Justin Houston of the Chiefs came out of college a similar player.

Shockt327 11-27-2012 04:57 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elijah (Post 3261551)
Hightower is not an OLB/DE. He's a pure linebacker, whether it be OLB/MLB in the 4-3 or ILB in the 3-4. I don't get why people think he could play DE. From what I've heard, he didn't do that much at Alabama and when he did, it wasn't that great. He has gotten pressure from the inside this year, so why not just keep that going?

You can see almost every snap from him at Alabama on You Tube. He played both ILB and off edge at DE/OLB....where he was a playmaker.

Dont'a Hightower vs Tennessee 2011 - YouTube

Also, when we play out of a 3-4 front Hightower does indeed play off the strong side edge at OLB.

signbabybrady 11-27-2012 04:58 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
Nothing against Hightower off the edge but I would rather just see Jones back in the lineup and healthy and have Scott fill in for Cunningham.

Spergon Wynn 11-27-2012 05:32 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
One of the reasons I wanted Hightower so bad in the draft is that I believed he could play almost any where within the front seven. I don't like to see him get more snaps at DE and maybe in the interior like Cunningham did.

1%er 11-27-2012 06:39 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by signbabybrady (Post 3261558)
Nothing against Hightower off the edge but I would rather just see Jones back in the lineup and healthy and have Scott fill in for Cunningham.

I don't think Scott has the strength at DT in a sub package. He is listed at 6'5 255lbs and more of an outside rusher. The only players on are roster who can fill Cunningham's role are Bequette and Francis IMO.

Honestly I expect that we will see more of Deaderick and maybe use Jones inside more often.

patsfaninpa 11-27-2012 08:48 PM

re: Dont'a Hightower off the edge?
 
I've thought this since we went to this version of the 4-3. The LDE is standing up and can rush the passer or drop back into coverage. Donta can do both. That's where I want him at. He may have run a 4.68 at the combine. But, at 270lb he isn't that fast any longer or have the agility go cover people in space like a 4-3 olb has to. Now, if you think Spikes will leave after next year. I'd be fine with Donta sliding into his role at MLB. If we extend Spikes, I'd put Donta at LDE. Hell he's much stronger than Cunningham and could slide into that dt role in pass-rushing situations.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566