![]() |
Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
Bye bye Lieawatha on this one.
Boston Globe original source of all things. Quote:
|
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
Quote:
|
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
Quote:
New Jersey Courts And you can usually get it for under $200 and sometimes even online.... She couldn't find one long day a year to keep up with CE?????? Wow, I have three times that requirement for my licenses in my profession and I exceed that minimum easily......... As a professor didn't she have the months of June,July and August off class???? |
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
Well when she fraudulently claims to be an American Indian, why would anyone be surprised she practices law fraudulently without a license?
|
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
I hope she isnt lying about being a Democrat.
|
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
She could have.....
* Alerted Whitey Bulger that he was going to be arrested. * Cleaned the knife OJ killed his wife with. * Burned the town of Lawrence in the 80's. * Helped Chuck Stewart As long as she has a D next to her name, she still has a good chance to win in Massachusetts. |
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
There is some good information in this Monday Sept 24 article created by
William A. Jacobson - Associate Clinical Professor, Cornell Law School » Elizabeth Warren’s law license problem - Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion |
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
Quote:
Apparently you don't need a state license to try a federal case. Quote:
It may be that she needed someone to move to have her admitted pro hac vice and that may or may not have been done. I don't know. But it might be smart to wait and see. Just so no one looks gullible or anything. |
Re: Lieawatha practice bad law medicine.
Quote:
1) She needs someone to support her "pro hac vice" application and there has to be a written record of that.She has to reveal to the court whether she is admitted to practice in that court or have someone to support her application. 2) She hasn't revealed her list of cases that she worked on and whether any were non-Federal cases which would pose a problem. In light of this disclosure, do you think she should reveal the list to determine whether she worked on any state cases?? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.