![]() |
Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
By: Steve Balestrieri Probably the most athletically gifted of the Patriots running backs; Vereen can carry the ball inside, outside and can be very effective catching the ball. He's a one cut and go type of runner; he won't dance behind the line of scrimmage. He's very good a... |
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
I think the team will carry four. As has been said, Ridley, Vereen, and Woodhead are locks. I hope the last RB they carry (should they carry four) is a FB. The run offense has been needing a FB since Evans left town, particularly on third and short and goal line plays, where the team has had to implement the likes of Connolly and other OL to clear ILB's out of the A-Gap on occasion. If they carry four, I think it's highly unlikely that Addai makes the team.
|
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
Addai makes the team because he's the only real veteran out of the RB's we have. Ridley and especially Vereen are unproven and no way Woodhead is getting more than 10 touches a game.
|
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
I just don't have a good feel for the # of RBs they will carry. On gamedays I don't think they ever carried 5 runners but with KFs PUP status, Vereen's leg issue and the addition of Polite late in the year, there was clearly an interest in having a more rounded-out, versitile backfield.
I guess with the exception of Vereen, Ridley and Woodhead being cut, nothing would suprise me. |
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
Quote:
|
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
Count me with the others who want Ridley, Vereen, Woodhead, and (insert fullback: my choise is Tony F.).
|
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
Major "if" questions but if Vereen can actually live up to his second round status and Woodhead doesn't return to 2010 form, I see no reason to carry Woodhead. Vereen would make him obsolete. If Vereen really is a 3 down back (he split wide and had some good catches at Cal) there's no reason to take him off the field for Woodhead, especially the 2011 version. Woodhead has a strong chance to make the roster but is definitely no lock. Especially with Addai's ability on third down also.
|
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
Quote:
|
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
I think this position is very much up in the air.
If both the sophmores step up big in camp and can make the coaches feel good about relying on them then you could go with four (those two plus Woody, plus the winner of the FB battle), and if you went with 5 it would be soley for depth and insurance. If one or both are struggling then you need the 5th back and likely as more then insurance as you would probably have a role for him with whichever of the sophmores is struggling relegated to the insurance role unless you give up on that sophmore. Struggling could mean several things from injury, to finding a role/understanding the o, to fumbling. Honestly though I dont see it as a big worry I think there is enough talent and bodies there that what we need out of the running game will be attained. Woody already has a good percentage of snaps covered and you have good competition for the rest. |
Re: Training Camp Postional Preview - Running Backs
I for one, wouldn't be surprised if Woodhead is cut. I think only Vereen and Ridley are locks.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.