![]() |
Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
|
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
RUT RO RAGGY :bricks:
|
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
In all the rhetoric around this issue, always find comments such as this amusing..
Quote:
|
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
Though the article doesn't discuss contract length, guaranteeing him $21 mill seems excessive considering his age and his role going forward.
Two points: 1) His 2011 stats were inflated due to the lock out/lack of defense in the league when the season opened last year. In the month of September, QBs were dialing up 300-500 yd games at will. During the first quarter of 2011, Welker amassed 40% of his yardage stats and 5 of his 9 TDs. No question Wes had a great back half of the season as well....but this leads me to point #2 2) In 2011, #2 WR Branch averaged 3.3 catches/game. #3 WR Ochocinco averaged 1 catch/game. With Lloyd on the field and competent alternatives in the bullpen (Gafney, Branch), not to mention a new OC that loves targeting WRs, not a chance in hell Welker repeats his 2011 numbers. The nonWelker WR receptions could increase 75%. Logic dictates points #1 and #2. And my gutt tells me that McDaniels will incorporate more screen and RB pass plays as well. I also suspect BB will seek to regain the time of possession advantage by utilizing his young RBs and establishing a more consistent running game. Bottom line. Brady has more targets and a more reliable cast to lean on. And an evolving team philosophy may balance out the offense as well. I just don't see Welker repeating his 2011 numbers...so let them revisit his contract next offseason when he is a year older with more down to Earth stats. And lets not forget....The little guy was tackled 120 times last year....and concussions can take a player off the field for indefinite periods of time. |
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
6/2 = 3. #compromise
|
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
Quote:
|
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
Quote:
I am not saying the Pats shouldn't lock him up (in fact, I wish they would), but they do have concerns about when Welker's body will start to break down and I think those are legitimate concerns. He could go until he is 35 or 36 or he could start to break down this season for all we know. |
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
Quote:
|
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
Quote:
KC would be the logical choice. Something says MC would give a kidney for WW. Maybe Atlanta? |
Re: Bedard: Pats and Welker $6 mill apart
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.