New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/891003-tom-brady-game-following-bad-performance.html)

ivanvamp 01-27-2012 09:14 AM

Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
One of the memes going around is that Tom Brady doesn't have two bad games in a row. Is that really true? Let's make this scale (this isn't a "Tom Brady" scale, which is higher than most QBs...it's an "objective" scale that applies to all QBs):

QB Rating - Category
115+ - excellent
100-114.9 - very good
85-99.9 - good
75-84.9 - average
65-74.9 - poor
<65 - terrible

Tom Brady, in his entire career, has played in 181 games (regular season + post season). Here's the number of games he's played in each of those categories:

excellent: 41 (22.7%)
very good: 41 (22.7%)
good: 26 (14.4%)
average: 29 (16.0%)
poor: 19 (10.5%)
terrible: 25 (13.8%)

Now, let's focus on just the terrible games, since what we're looking for is how Brady does when he comes off a terrible game. Last week's AFCCG qualifies, by QB rating, as a "terrible" game (57.5). So let's zero in on those 25 terrible games. How has Brady done in the games following those 25 terrible games? Well, in 3 of them, he didn't have a "next" game (obviously he hasn't had a "next" game yet after this most recent one, once came in the 2009 wild card game against Baltimore so that ended the season, and the other was his short appearance in his 2000 debut). So there were really 22 terrible games where he then played a next game.

Of those 22, here's where his next games ended up on this scale:

excellent: 4 (18.2%)
very good: 3 (13.6%)
good: 4 (18.2%)
average: 7 (31.8%)
poor: 2 (9.1%)
terrible: 2 (9.1%)

Here were the actual QB ratings in his games following a terrible performance:

149.0
124.4
116.4
115.2
108.8
105.8
101.5
93.4
93.4
91.6
87.1
84.6
84.2
82.6
79.7
79.6
79.5
75.4
70.4
68.5
63.6
57.6

11 of them were over an 85 rating, and 11 of them were under. The average QB rating for Brady following a terrible game is 91.5.

On 3 of these 22 occasions Brady's terrible performance was followed up by a playoff game. Here was Brady's QB rating in the playoffs following a terrible performance (either in a previous playoff game or in a week 16 game):

116.4 (2005 - WC win over Jax, 28-3)
79.5 (2006 - AFCCG loss to Ind, 38-34)
70.4 (2001 - Divisional win over Oak, 16-13)

So here's the history: Brady is a great quarterback. He normally plays very well. His career playoff QB rating is significantly lower than his career regular season QB rating (87.6 vs. 96.4). And he really has been about 50/50 in terms of following up a terrible performance over the course of his career.

If you expand this study to look at how he does following up a game where he is anything less than "good" (i.e., he has an "average", "poor", or "terrible" game), the numbers are more encouraging. Following up any of these three levels, he has done this in his next game (65 occasions):

excellent: 14 (21.5%)
very good: 15 (23.1%)
good: 9 (13.8%)
average: 14 (21.5%)
poor: 6 (9.2%)
terrible: 7 (10.8%)

So he follows up a less than good game with a good, very good, or excellent game 58.5% of the time. So he's a better than average bet to play pretty well. But it isn't nearly the slam-dunk that most Pats fans think, unfortunately.

PATRIOTSFANINPA 01-27-2012 09:27 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
I would like to see what Brady's performance is coming off a bad performance followed by a week off to prepare for the next game?

A HOF QB given some extra time to prepare has to be a decent improvement 2 weeks later.

AndyJohnson 01-27-2012 09:34 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ivanvamp (Post 2931153)
One of the memes going around is that Tom Brady doesn't have two bad games in a row. Is that really true? Let's make this scale (this isn't a "Tom Brady" scale, which is higher than most QBs...it's an "objective" scale that applies to all QBs):

QB Rating - Category
115+ - excellent
100-114.9 - very good
85-99.9 - good
75-84.9 - average
65-74.9 - poor
<65 - terrible

Tom Brady, in his entire career, has played in 181 games (regular season + post season). Here's the number of games he's played in each of those categories:

excellent: 41 (22.7%)
very good: 41 (22.7%)
good: 26 (14.4%)
average: 29 (16.0%)
poor: 19 (10.5%)
terrible: 25 (13.8%)

Now, let's focus on just the terrible games, since what we're looking for is how Brady does when he comes off a terrible game. Last week's AFCCG qualifies, by QB rating, as a "terrible" game (57.5). So let's zero in on those 25 terrible games. How has Brady done in the games following those 25 terrible games? Well, in 3 of them, he didn't have a "next" game (obviously he hasn't had a "next" game yet after this most recent one, once came in the 2009 wild card game against Baltimore so that ended the season, and the other was his short appearance in his 2000 debut). So there were really 22 terrible games where he then played a next game.

Of those 22, here's where his next games ended up on this scale:

excellent: 4 (18.2%)
very good: 3 (13.6%)
good: 4 (18.2%)
average: 7 (31.8%)
poor: 2 (9.1%)
terrible: 2 (9.1%)

Here were the actual QB ratings in his games following a terrible performance:

149.0
124.4
116.4
115.2
108.8
105.8
101.5
93.4
93.4
91.6
87.1
84.6
84.2
82.6
79.7
79.6
79.5
75.4
70.4
68.5
63.6
57.6

11 of them were over an 85 rating, and 11 of them were under. The average QB rating for Brady following a terrible game is 91.5.

On 3 of these 22 occasions Brady's terrible performance was followed up by a playoff game. Here was Brady's QB rating in the playoffs following a terrible performance (either in a previous playoff game or in a week 16 game):

116.4 (2005 - WC win over Jax, 28-3)
79.5 (2006 - AFCCG loss to Ind, 38-34)
70.4 (2001 - Divisional win over Oak, 16-13)

So here's the history: Brady is a great quarterback. He normally plays very well. His career playoff QB rating is significantly lower than his career regular season QB rating (87.6 vs. 96.4). And he really has been about 50/50 in terms of following up a terrible performance over the course of his career.

If you expand this study to look at how he does following up a game where he is anything less than "good" (i.e., he has an "average", "poor", or "terrible" game), the numbers are more encouraging. Following up any of these three levels, he has done this in his next game (65 occasions):

excellent: 14 (21.5%)
very good: 15 (23.1%)
good: 9 (13.8%)
average: 14 (21.5%)
poor: 6 (9.2%)
terrible: 7 (10.8%)

So he follows up a less than good game with a good, very good, or excellent game 58.5% of the time. So he's a better than average bet to play pretty well. But it isn't nearly the slam-dunk that most Pats fans think, unfortunately.

Nice woirk, but it must be noted that passer rating is a horrible scale of actual QB play. But I recognize its the only number available to you for the purpose you are trying to use it.

BlueThunder 01-27-2012 09:36 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
One has to wonder how his injured non-throwing shoulder affects his performance.

It has been reported that he requested his QB trainer to help him out and analyze his throwing mechanics.

everlong 01-27-2012 09:50 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
Nice work. There's still a lot of variables. Who was the opponent the next week? If you're coming off of a bad performance and you get a top defense you might only put up a 85 QBR but you played really well. When in the career did it happen? One of the examples is Oakland back in 01 when he was basically a rookie and it was snowing like crazy.

I use QBR more than any other stat but unless you watch the actual games and get a feel for how the QB actually played it's not complete.

scott99 01-27-2012 09:56 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
Stats-smats, It's pretty simple. If Brady plays like he did against the Broncos, we win, if he plays like he did against the Ravens, we lose.

ivanvamp 01-27-2012 10:00 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA (Post 2931171)
I would like to see what Brady's performance is coming off a bad performance followed by a week off to prepare for the next game?

A HOF QB given some extra time to prepare has to be a decent improvement 2 weeks later.

Brady has only had two "terrible" games which were followed by a bye week before his next game. Here they were:

2001 - week 16, he went 17-29 (58.6%), 198 yds, 1 td, 2 int, 62.1 rating against the Panthers. They earned a bye for the playoffs as the #2 seed, then hosted the Raiders in the Snow Bowl game. For that game, Brady had this line: 32-52 (61.5%), 312 yds, 0 td, 1 int, 70.4 rating.

2002 - week 6, he put up this line in a 28-10 loss to the Packers: 24-44 (54.5%), 183 yds, 1 td, 3 int, 44.0 rating. They had a bye for week 7, then they lost to Denver in week 8, 24-16, with Brady putting up this line: 15-29 (51.7%), 130 yds, 1 td, 0 int, 75.4 rating.

In 2007 he had a "bad" game in the AFCCG against SD in a 21-12 win: 22-33 (66.7%), 209 yds, 2 td, 3 int, 66.4 rating. They had the bye then played the Giants in the SB, where Brady put up this line: 29-48 (60.4%), 266 yds, 1 td, 0 int, 82.5 rating.

Here are all of Brady's stat lines the week after a bye. I'll designate which games followed anything less than a "good" performance, according to my rubric (marked with an *):

2001 - Divisional Round - 32-52 (61.5%), 312 yds, 0 td, 1 int, 70.4 rating - beat Oak 16-13*

2001 - Super Bowl - 16-27 (59.3%), 145 yds, 1 td, 0 int, 86.2 rating - beat StL 20-17

2002 - Week 8 - 15-29 (51.7%), 130 yds, 1 td, 0 int, 75.4 rating - lost to Den 24-16*

2003 - Week 10 - 15-34 (44.1%), 212 yds, 0 td, 0 int, 64.8 rating - beat Dal 12-0

2003 - Divisional Round - 21-41 (51.2%), 201 yds, 1 td, 0 int, 73.3 rating - beat Ten 17-14

2003 - Super Bowl - 32-48 (66.7%), 354 yds, 3 td, 1 int, 100.5 rating - beat Car 32-29*

2004 - Week 3 - 17-30 (56.7%), 298 yds, 2 td, 0 int, 112.9 rating - beat Buf 31-17*

2004 - Super Bowl - 23-33 (69.7%), 236 yds, 2 td, 0 int, 110.2 rating - beat Phi 24-21

2005 - Week 7 - 14-21 (66.7%), 199 yds, 1 td, 0 int, 113.0 rating - beat Buf 21-16*

2006 - Week 6 - 18-27 (66.7%), 195 yds, 2 td, 0 int, 112.4 rating - beat Buf 28-6

2007 - Week 10 - 31-39 (79.5%), 373 yds, 5 td, 0 int, 146.1 rating - beat Buf 56-10

2007 - Divisional Round - 26-28 (92.9%), 262 yds, 3 td, 0 int, 141.4 rating - beat Jax 31-20

2007 - Super Bowl - 29-48 (60.4%), 266 yds, 1 td, 0 int, 82.5 rating - lost to NYG 17-14*

2008 - N/A

2009 - Week 8 - 25-37 (67.6%), 332 yds, 1 td, 1 int, 93.5 rating - beat Mia 27-17

2010 - Week 5 - 27-44 (61.4%), 292 yds, 1 td, 2 int, 69.5 rating - beat Bal 23-20

2010 - Divisional Round - 29-45 (64.4%), 299 yds, 2 td, 1 int, 89.0 rating - lost to NYJ 28-21

2011 - Week 7 - 24-35 (68.6%), 198 yds, 2 td, 0 int, 101.8 rating - lost to Pit 25-17

2011 - Divisional Round - 26-34 (76.5%), 363 yds, 6 td, 1 int, 137.6 rating - beat Den 45-10

That's 18 games following a bye. Of these 18, here's where they would fit in my rubric:

excellent: 3 (16.7%)
very good: 6 (33.3%)
good: 3 (16.7%)
average: 2 (11.1%)
poor: 3 (16.7%)
terrible: 1 (5.6%)

So 12 of the 18 (66.7%) were "good" or better.

Of these 18, just 6 of them followed a performance that was "average" or worse. Here were the QB ratings in those 6 instances: 70.4, 75.4, 100.5, 112.9, 113.0, and 82.5.

So again, a bit of a mixed bag. He's never been hideous in that situation, but he's never been insanely brilliant either. He's either been below average or very good. 50-50 proposition, really.

Wish I had better news to share!

ivanvamp 01-27-2012 10:04 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by everlong (Post 2931205)
Nice work. There's still a lot of variables. Who was the opponent the next week? If you're coming off of a bad performance and you get a top defense you might only put up a 85 QBR but you played really well. When in the career did it happen? One of the examples is Oakland back in 01 when he was basically a rookie and it was snowing like crazy.

I use QBR more than any other stat but unless you watch the actual games and get a feel for how the QB actually played it's not complete.

No doubt. And a QB can play really well but still finish with just a so-so QB rating. For example, let's say Brady hits 90% of his completions and gets the team down to the 1 every time, but they run the ball in from there. He won't have the TD on his stat line which really would have boosted his QB rating.

So to you, and to Andy, I agree, it's not a crystal clear picture. But it really is about all I have available, unfortunately. Baseball stat geeks have done a ridiculously great job of breaking down everything that happens on a field and the stats are incredible. There is something called "linear weights" that quantifies everything. I wish there was something like that for football but, to my knowledge, there is not. So this is all I have to go with. Sorry!

TommyBrady12 01-27-2012 10:10 AM

Re: Tom Brady: The Game Following a Bad Performance
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA (Post 2931171)
I would like to see what Brady's performance is coming off a bad performance followed by a week off to prepare for the next game?

A HOF QB given some extra time to prepare has to be a decent improvement 2 weeks later.

Brady played bad in the 2007 AGCCG, he played bad in the super bowl 2 weeks later. I do remember him sitting out the first week of practice prior to the super bowl, probably with that ankle sprain.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563