New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   GB vs NE Defensively (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/841759-gb-vs-ne-defensively.html)

mgcolby 11-04-2011 03:58 PM

GB vs NE Defensively
 
On the way into work this morning I heard a national analyst talking about every fanboy's favorite subject...power rankings!

He asked how the Pats could be in the Top 5 with that putrid defense and that some power rankings had them as high as #2 behind the Packers. His next statement is what got me thinking and ultimately led to this thread.

He stated that Green Bay is clearly #1 and then went on to list several other teams in order; before returning his attention back to the Pats, once again putting the low ranking on the Pats defensive play.

Now, I don't particularly give two ****s about power rankings. But I do know that most people consider Green Bay to be the best team in the league, which is well deserved coming off a Super Bowl win and opening the season 7-0.

But, I have watched everyone of Green Bay's games, and without stats to prove it, I didn't think the Packers defense was any better than ours. I thought everything that is said about the Pats defense could easily be said about the Packers defense (can't get off the field on 3rd down, terrible against the pass, decent against the run, hold teams to FG's in the red zone etc...).

So, I decided to go through the stats just to see if my observations were accurate. Come to find out, I couldn't have been closer to the truth....

Because of the formatting here is how to read the info below:

1. I listed the team's defensive averages and league rankings at the top
2. Then I listed each teams opponents offensive ranking in four categories (total passing, total rushing, Total offense and Points Per Game scored)
3. Then I listed each opponents offensive average for the season in parenthesis followed by the total season average of the opponents and where that average would rank league wide.
4. Opponent record for each team (includes games played against GB and NE)

Here is the raw data:

Green Bay
Passing: 290 (31st)
Rushing: 102 (10th)
Total: 391 (28th)
3rd down: 43% (22nd)
PPG 20 (9th)

NO : Pass: 1st Rush: 11th Total: 2nd PPG: 2nd
CAR: Pass: 5th Rush: 7th Total: 5th PPG: 14th
CHI: Pass: 17th Rush: 15th Total: 16th PPG: 13th
DEN: Pass: 30th Rush: 8th Total: 27th PPG: 23rd
ATL: Pass: 18th Rush: 17th Total: 17th PPG: 17th
STL: Pass: 26th Rush: 20th Total: 28th PPG: 31st
MIN: Pass: 29th Rush: 3rd Total: 18th PPG: 20th

(Opp season Averages) (Total Avg/would be league rank)
PPG (32.5;23.4;24.3;19;22.6;12.4;21.5) (22.2 / 19th)
Total (441.1;415.1;421;305.4;335;304.3;332.6) (364.9 / 13th)
Rush (117.4;129.6;114.7;125.9;112.7;105.9;150.4) (122.3 / 10th)
Pass (326.8;285.5;222.7;179.6;222.3;198.4;182.2) (202.5 / 24th)
Opp Record: 20-32

New England
Passing: 323 (32nd)
Rushing: 101 (9th)
Total: 424 (32nd)
3rd down: 46% (30th)
PPG: 23 (17th)

MIA: Pass: 25th Rush: 12th Total: 21st PPG: 28th
SD : Pass: 6th Rush: 13th Total: 6th PPG: 15th
BUF: Pass: 13th Rush: 5th Total: 10th PPG: 3rd
OAK: Pass: 23rd Rush: 2nd Total: 12th PPG: 16th
NYJ: Pass: 22nd Rush: 28th Total: 29th PPG: 11th
DAL: Pass: 7th Rush: 15th Total: 8th PPG: 18th
PIT: Pass: 8th Rush: 14th Total: 9th PPG: 19th

(Opp season Averages) (Total Avg/would be league rank)
PPG (15.3; 23; 30.1; 22.9; 24.6; 22.3; 22) (22.8 17th)
Total (318.9; 399.4;380.1;365.6;300.1; 394.3;388.8) (363.9 13th)
Rush (116.9; 116; 140.6; 159.3;92.4;114.7; 115.4) (122.1 10th)
Pass (202;283.4;239.6;206.3;207.7;279.6;273.4) (241.7 12th)
Opp Record: 26-24

My point here for those wondering, is that the "best team in the league" has the exact same flaw that we have. Every team in the league is hurting somewhere. The Eagles O-line is garbage, LB's suck. The Ravens have Flacco and a mind numbing reluctance to run the football. The Steelers O-line leaves a lot to be desired and have LB's dropping like flies due to injury, not mention Big Ben's love affair with turnovers in big games. The Packers defense is a liability. New England's Defense is a liability. I could go on.

I have stayed away from posting this week because this place becomes unbearable after a loss. From garbage like "Maybe Bill Walsh was right" and other threads, one would think this was a 2-5 team coming off a loss to the Rams at home.

We lost to the defending AFC champions on the road by 8 points, playing the worst football we have played all season. The putrid defense held the Steelers to 6 points in the second half. The offense struggled to adjust to the surprising man pressure etc.... it was one loss get over it.

I think far to many people only watch the Pats play on Sunday, then watch highlights on ESPN of the other games. And then listen to uninformed opinions from the talking heads, like my example above.

Maybe they even go as far as comparing these Pats with Patriot teams of the early 2000's; which were one of the most efficient, and well disciplined football teams to ever step on to a football field. Then come to the conclusion that this team isn't good enough to win it all.

The only thing that is relevant now, is how they stack up against the other 31 teams in the league this year. And coming from someone that watches every game, every week, this team stacks up really well!

JJDChE 11-04-2011 04:34 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
I'll just put this right here...

The last 4 games we're allowing our opponents 2.7ppg less than their season average.

Ron Sellers 11-04-2011 04:53 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
I think it's a lot of fans blindly following whatever the media tells them, and right now the Packers are flavor of the month. My guess is that once the Packers lose a game or two the tide will quickly turn and some of these very same analysts that are hyping them today will label them as overrated tomorrow.

I haven't seen every game like you have but from the games of theirs that I have seen I had the same identical impression. Thanks for taking the time to pull those stats together.

LasVegasPatsFan 11-04-2011 05:02 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
Winning masks problems and loosing exposes them. That's media for you.

randomk1 11-04-2011 05:08 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
Packers have lost Collins and Cullen Jenkins...those guys were big pieces in that last years D.

They are still better than our D though.

Sivy 11-04-2011 05:18 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
Packers have played crap teams..I love how people just ignore these things

Sciz 11-04-2011 05:22 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sivy (Post 2773384)
Packers have played crap teams..I love how people just ignore these things

This is off-topic, but related to this. People are talking about Rodgers as a legitimate candidate to set the passer rating record. What they don't realize is that he hasn't faced a top-half passer rating defense yet, and he won't until he plays the Lions.

mgcolby 11-04-2011 05:59 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by randomk1 (Post 2773364)
Packers have lost Collins and Cullen Jenkins...those guys were big pieces in that last years D.

They are still better than our D though.

Based on what? The stats tell you they are nearly identical against similarly ranked offenses. Actually, the Packers defense is ranked 31st in the league in passing against an opponent average passing yardage per game that would rank 24th in the league. The Pats opponents on the other hand would rank 12th.

So once again please explain what makes GB's defense better? :confused:

primetime 11-04-2011 06:55 PM

Re: GB vs NE Defensively
 
stating that the packers are 31st and the patriots 32nd and acting like theyre sooo close isnt telling the true story. the patriots allow almost 40 more passing yards per game than the packers, have fewer turnovers, and the packers have a passer rating against of 70 versus the patriots' 92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566