![]() |
Have teams stopped trading with BB?
I like rookBoston's theory of a perpetual trading of the 2nd #1 pick, but are teams wising up to the Patriots Way? The refusal to pay the price for the #33 pick last week is an indication. BB wanted a 2011 #2 (mid round) and a 2012 2nd round pick, and no one would bite. All Access showed BB slamming the phone down on sevearl teams (Mike Reiss speculated the Niners were one of them).
|
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
Quote:
Now that I know this, I'm happier that we didn't move the pick. |
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
Quote:
|
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
Umm...didn't he make a ton of trades? :confused: The one example cited to support the idea in the title of this thread -- the failure to trade #33 -- seems like exactly the opposite. We saw lots of teams wanted to trade with BB and him not accepting their offers.
|
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
Quote:
|
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
I'm hoping the value offered wasn't worth giving up on Dowling,atleast in BB's mind.
And we did get a 1st / 2nd round pick as usual. |
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
I think any team that decided "I'm not trading with coach XYZ under any circumstances" would only be shooting themselves in their own foot.
|
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
Quote:
|
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
Curious, curious, premise.
No team that executed a trade with BB did so AFAIK with a gun to their head. I think that those team are generally happy with the trade. The Saints with Ingram, the Packers with Matthews, the Cowboys with Bryant.* They willingly paid BBs price to get "their" guy. In fact, teams should be tripping over each other to talk to BB, since they know he's always willing to trade back if the price is right. * I don't actually remember if those trades were directly with the Patriots. I'm pretty sure they were at least tangentially. Regardless, you get the point. |
Re: Have teams stopped trading with BB?
There's probably some truth to it. He took a bad deal when he traded out of 60 and he had to pay more for his future #2 this time around. And I find it hard to believe that he didn't at least try to trade back from 73.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.