![]() |
Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
It's amazing to me how the gubmit can create formula's on it's own and certify them as being both accurate and legitimate. I'm currently going through an abatement appeal with a city government over some commercial space, and in meeting with the assessor, he attempted to explain the "formula" they use to calculate property "value". It was anything but a formula, as it was entirely subjective. At any rate...
Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure Published: Tuesday, 12 Apr 2011 | 5:18 PM ET Text Size By: John Melloy Executive Producer, Fast Money After former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker was appointed in 1979, the consumer price index surged into the double digits, causing the now revered Fed Chief to double the benchmark interest rate in order to break the back of inflation. Using the methodology in place at that time puts the CPI back near those levels. Inflation, using the reporting methodologies in place before 1980, hit an annual rate of 9.6 percent in February, according to the Shadow Government Statistics newsletter. Since 1980, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has changed the way it calculates the CPI in order to account for the substitution of products, improvements in quality (i.e. iPad 2 costing the same as original iPad) and other things. Backing out more methods implemented in 1990 by the BLS still puts inflation at a 5.5 percent rate and getting worse, according to the calculations by the newsletter’s web site, Shadowstats.com. News Headlines |
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Same with the unemployment numbers. This is designed to get incumbents reelected. Wait till gas gets to %5 per gallon it will affect everything.
|
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Yep, they've fudged with statistics quite a bit. Our unemployment rates would be double or worse according to the standards used during the Depression.
All is well. All is well. |
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
The formula was changed in 1980, but now you are complaining? That was 31 years ago.
|
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Quote:
|
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Quote:
:rofl: .... Now that's epic delayed laughter ... good one. +1 |
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Quote:
Complaining is the one thing this is as constant as death and taxes. ;) |
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Quote:
|
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Quote:
The more money we print the higher the inflation rate. i don't know why administrations get blamed for inflation. They can help by spending less money of course but inflation is directly related to the money supply which is a fed issue. Other issues contribute of course but the money supply is a hug component and we have had the printers blazing. To discuss inflation we need to discuss the corruptness of the fed ... not that it would get us anywhere of course. |
Re: Inflation Actually Near 10% Using Older Measure
Quote:
If you are interested you can see the 'real' number on internet for the period from 1981 to the present. I am interested in the current number because we are being sold that the employment picture is improving a lot which is false. The inflation will also cause the FED to raise interest rates to fund our spending driving up the cost of goods and raising the amount of interest we pay servicing our debt which will do a LOT of damage to the economy. The politicians seem blissfully unaware of this or at least they won't speak about it to avoid panicking the rubes. National debt interest rates will take big chunk from budget - Feb. 2, 2011 Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.