New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Defense keeps playing with fire (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/73812-defense-keeps-playing-fire.html)

SVN 01-13-2008 03:47 AM

Defense keeps playing with fire
 
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/f...63#articleFull

another felger article..somehow he keeps saying the same thing week in week out. what does he want the pats to do ? draft and make trades now ? . We have won with what we have. and he keeps prefacing all the sentences with "we" as if he is speaking for all of us.

RhodyPatriot 01-13-2008 05:01 AM

Re: Defense keeps playing with fire
 
This was Felger's FIRST observation from the field right after the game on FSNE's post game show. The guy is a weenie who thinks he's some football guru. Greg Dickerson and Christian Fauria has this 'what is your problem oh whiney one' look on their faces as they listened to this dweeb.
This is a bend don't break defense similar to what we had back in '01. They ain't pretty and they give up a lots of yards but they make big plays when they need to. Keep in mind the Jags scored six points in the second half. 6!!
Six in the entire second half and only scored 13 after their 1st possession at the beginning of the game. This Patriot team shut down the Jags running game, shut down their ability to chew up the clock with that running game, and forced Garrard to win it with his arm. He couldn't! Welcome to the Patriots blueprint. Disrupt what the other team does best and make them beat you in other ways. The Jags couldn't.
What I don't like about a guy like Felger is he takes the teams defensive approach with one team (the Jags) and tries to apply that same game plan against another opponent (The Colts) as if the Patriots D will focus and approach both games the same way. They won't. The Patriots defensive schemes vary from team to team based on the strengths of that team.

mcdonut16 01-13-2008 07:35 AM

Re: Defense keeps playing with fire
 
I am not going to say it was not frustrating at times watching the Defense play last night, but let's not forget that the Jags Offense was #6 in scoring in the league this year.

If you take the last 10 meaningful games the Jags played, they were averaging 32.4 points a game. They also scored at least 24 point in everyone of there last 11 games.

1. The Patriots held the Jags to 12.4 below their average.
2. Made great halftime adjustements as the Jags only scored 6 points in the second half.
3. Held Jones-Drew and Taylor to 66 rushing yards. The Jags had the #2 rushing offense in the league averaging almost 150 yards a game.
4. The Patriots played a softer zone D that emphasized stopping the run not the pass. You have to give up something if you are going to take away the run like they did.
5. Gerard had a good game and was very accurate.

The Patriots D is not what it used to be, but I think people are over reacting a bit once you take a look what actually went on last night.

robertweathers 01-13-2008 07:37 AM

Re: Defense keeps playing with fire
 
I dont know what his deal is. He needs to step back and acknowledge the philosophical approach this defense takes to it's opponents. Sure, in the 1st 1/2 the D could have tackled a bit better or played the coverage a little tighter (I thought that they respected the Jag's WRs a bit too much, but that is their strategy- no big pass plays). But their strategy as mentioned was to contain the run and let Garrard beat them. Taylor and Drew had a couple plays here and there but in the end, the D did the job.

In his analysis ( if you want to call it that) Felger needs to take into account that BB couldn't care less about yards. All that matters is points against and 3rd down defense. Keep in mind, this was a hot offense comming in with in the last 8 games of the year, they were ave. about 30 a game. They were rolling and the Pats D did a decent job. They forced a couple of TOs and cam away with the W.

Survive and advance. Style points no longer count.

FrontSeven 01-13-2008 07:53 AM

Re: Defense keeps playing with fire
 
I was concerned and frustrated at times too. The bottom line in the big boys' league is to be able to say, "at times". They limited a high scoring offense to 6 frickin points at crunch time.

DarrylS 01-13-2008 07:56 AM

Re: Defense keeps playing with fire
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mcdonut16 (Post 737103)
I am not going to say it was not frustrating at times watching the Defense play last night, but let's not forget that the Jags Offense was #6 in scoring in the league this year.

If you take the last 10 meaningful games the Jags played, they were averaging 32.4 points a game. They also scored at least 24 point in everyone of there last 11 games.

1. The Patriots held the Jags to 12.4 below their average.
2. Made great halftime adjustements as the Jags only scored 6 points in the second half.
3. Held Jones-Drew and Taylor to 66 rushing yards. The Jags had the #2 rushing offense in the league averaging almost 150 yards a game.
4. The Patriots played a softer zone D that emphasized stopping the run not the pass. You have to give up something if you are going to take away the run like they did.
5. Gerard had a good game and was very accurate.

The Patriots D is not what it used to be, but I think people are over reacting a bit once you take a look what actually went on last night.

All of this combined with the BB philosophy to take away the strength of the opposing team.. the Jags are a rushing juggernaut.. take it away something else has to give.. it is what it is a very good win.. Felger can go suck..ss

MoLewisrocks 01-13-2008 07:58 AM

Re: Defense keeps playing with fire
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RhodyPatriot (Post 737004)
This was Felger's FIRST observation from the field right after the game on FSNE's post game show. The guy is a weenie who thinks he's some football guru.

Makes him just like a lot of the fan base around here these days...

I guesss that's why he's still employed here. His appeal is to the self absorbed weenies among us who believe they too are football guru's. Just a lonely voice of nega...I mean objectivity intent on ruin...I mean keeping it real for the koolaid swillers among us who just want to enjoy the journey warts and all.

Shame on the rest of us dimwit homers for not grasping that a win is not a win unless you dominate in all phases of every game, and your achievements therefore are less satisfying and leave some feeling incomplete. We should probably return the last 3 Lombardi's since we barely won them by 3 when we not only had defensive lapses but an offense that could barely keep pace with those lapses... Until we can win convincingly and complete the little Felger that exists in so many on the bandwaggon, what will we ever have truly accomplished...

Del Rio, like the coaches before him who took the nothing to lose approach against us down the stretch, gambled on this matchup and focused on it for 3 weeks (and perhaps parts of 2 offseasons...). He knew our AARP contingent would focus on taking away the run, and I'll be dammed if they didn't - 2 headed monster and all. Like Cowher in 2005, he prepared for teams to put the ball in his QB's hands and it almost worked against a secondary playing without <arguably> it's best cover corner. Hat's off to him, and Garrard. They played their best game of the season, and still lost. And by 11 that should by all rights been 14 but for a missed chip shot or 17-21 but for the rarest of the rare, a Welker drop.

Screw all the Felger's - wins complete me.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563