New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard - Peter King contiues to misrepresent SpyGate (Yet, he wants back in)

Page 1 of 6

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)

- PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)

- - Peter King contiues to misrepresent SpyGate (Yet, he wants back in) (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/710569-peter-king-contiues-misrepresent-spygate-yet-he-wants-back.html)

RhodyPatriot

12-13-2010 09:55 AM

Peter King contiues to misrepresent SpyGate (Yet, he wants back in)

From King's column today.
"Three years ago, when the Patriots exterminated the rest of the league, they did so under the shadow of Spygate, when they were sanctioned by commissioner Roger Goodell after the first game of the season for secretly videotaping teams' defensive signals to try to gain an advantage."

If memory serves the Patriots weren't SECRETLY videotaping at all. They were out in the open for all to see.
Come on Pepe King. This is why people hate the media.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...html?eref=sihp

blackglass3

12-13-2010 09:58 AM

Peter King wants back in

Apparently, he's finally over himself and has stepped off his Spygate high horse. Someone wants to thaw the freezeout in Foxboro.

Quote:

4. All of a sudden, in a competitive sense, Spygate doesn't seem so important.

In the past week, the Patriots have beaten two of the best teams in the league by a combined 81-10. As it was in 2007, when New England was laying waste to the league while going 16-0 in the regular season, there's a gap between New England and the rest of the league that, in today's football, is rare. I thought the beatdown of the Bears at Soldier Field Sunday was significant because, as Brian Urlacher said, "They came in here, our field, our weather, and pounded us.''

Read more: DeSean Jackson's big night; Spygate effect; Sal Alosi punishment - Peter King - SI.com

ALP	12-13-2010 10:03 AM

Re: Peter King wants back in

i didnt really care but now i realize its getting ridiculous

why all the spygate mentions all of a sudden? like wtf?

i read MMQB every week but after this column i REALLY want someone to let this guy know: the 1st round pick and fine were ridiculous

ask him this question, if the patriots were taping the signals, but instead of having their guy on the sideline they had them in the stands, is it a violition?

answer? it isn't

King should know better

reflexblue

12-13-2010 10:04 AM

Re: Peter King wants back in

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackglass3 (Post 2389748)

Apparently, he's finally over himself and has stepped off his Spygate high horse. Someone wants to thaw the freezeout in Foxboro.

I read the whole thing, i wouldn't let him back in. He keeps repeating that the pats were Long Time Cheaters even though it was common place for ALL the teams to tape up until 07. (even Goody Never used the word cheat) While he writes that the team has a better record after SG he does all he can to trash them first. Hes a Fat F****** Clown

ALP	12-13-2010 10:05 AM

re: Peter King contiues to misrepresent SpyGate (Yet, he wants back in)

Quote:

Originally Posted by RhodyPatriot (Post 2389743)

From King's column today.
"Three years ago, when the Patriots exterminated the rest of the league, they did so under the shadow of Spygate, when they were sanctioned by commissioner Roger Goodell after the first game of the season for secretly videotaping teams' defensive signals to try to gain an advantage."

If memory serves the Patriots weren't SECRETLY videotaping at all. They were out in the open for all to see.
Come on Pepe King. This is why people hate the media.

DeSean Jackson's big night; Spygate effect; Sal Alosi punishment - Peter King - SI.com

theres another thread on this with my response to king and what one of us should tell him...i would look into it

RhodyPatriot

12-13-2010 10:06 AM

Re: Peter King wants back in

Misrepresenting what actually happened with SpyGate thus continuing the public's lack of factual understanding of what really went on is not going to open those Gillette doors for Pepe.
Can you be SECRETLY videotaping when standing out in the open on the sidelines for all to see??

Uncle Rico

12-13-2010 10:07 AM

Re: Peter King wants back in

More proof that the whole thing was overblown.

He has this too, about his chart showing that Pats have gotten BETTER since the Spygate stuff came out:

"New England's gone from winning two-thirds of its games with the benefit of taping illegally, to winning three-quarters of its games and scoring six points more per game without taping -- and with so many new pieces on offense."

Here's my theory: The whole incident scared off every other team that was videotaping and/or doing who knows what as well; a level playing field will always benefit Belichick.

reflexblue

12-13-2010 10:08 AM

re: Peter King contiues to misrepresent SpyGate (Yet, he wants back in)

This Assclown brings SG up every time he can. Its obvious he has an agenda.

IllegalContact

12-13-2010 10:10 AM

Re: Peter King wants back in

Urlacher: 'our weather'

he could not be more wrong

ALP	12-13-2010 10:11 AM

Re: Peter King wants back in

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Rico (Post 2389770)

More proof that the whole thing was overblown.

He has this too, about his chart showing that Pats have gotten BETTER since the Spygate stuff came out:

"New England's gone from winning two-thirds of its games with the benefit of taping illegally, to winning three-quarters of its games and scoring six points more per game without taping -- and with so many new pieces on offense."

Here's my theory: The whole incident scared off every other team that was videotaping and/or doing who knows what as well; a level playing field will always benefit Belichick.

thats a very valid point, never thought about it that way, wonder what other tactics there were

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.

Page 1 of 6

Last »

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95