New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Dr Z analysis (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/69509-dr-z-analysis.html)

SVN 12-04-2007 10:26 AM

Dr Z analysis
 
makes some interesting points regarding our defense and mankins

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ats/index.html

Quote:

The defense got walloped. Adalius Thomas, playing against his old mates, made a few plays in the first period. After that he could have been in the witness protection program. In the third quarter, when the Ravens keyed their offense to the thundering hoofbeats of McGahee, the only notice you took of Adalius, was the way he was getting driven backward. The Ravens keyed their thrust to the right side of the Patriots' defensive line, which came out in a base 4-3 precisely because their coaches feared what actually happened.

And the guy who took the major heat was all-pro Richard Seymour. Oh my, what a job Baltimore' bowling ball of a left guard, Jason Brown, did on him. And Jonathan Ogden on whoever manned the DRE spot was a heavy overmatch. And Tedy Bruschi in the middle looked like a little guy who was getting overrun. These chaps aren't getting any younger.

It will be interesting to see what Pittsburgh does to the Patriots linemen on both sides of the ball. Particularly distressing was the sight of my all-pro left guard, Logan Mankins, getting eaten up by 340-pound Haloti Ngata. Hey, the Steelers have some big guys, too.

Well, Maybe Steve Young was right and this was just a downbeat period for the unbeaten Patriots, and once they've righted themselves they'll go back to covering their 14-, 16-, 20-point spreads. But maybe the Ravens opened up a window to something more sinister, something that could be exploited by a big, muscular, physical team, coached by people who aren't terrified by the prospect of scoring a major upset.

ClevTrev 12-04-2007 10:33 AM

Re: Dr Z analysis
 
I agree with him. It's a well-written piece.

ironwasp 12-04-2007 10:42 AM

Re: Dr Z analysis
 
I agree with him too.

There is no question that the team looks significantly more vulnerable now than it did during the bye week. The defence was shockingly poor through three quarters last night, and only the fact that they stepped up hugely in Q4 is keeping me from blind panic. What was really shocking last nigth was how the defensive line was manhandled in the running game. It was ugly. And when they play like that it's difficult to cover up the lack of speed in the LB corps.

I don't have many concerns about the offense - which still piled up 27 points on one of the best D's in the league that was playing with huge passion - except for the fact that cold windy stadia are likely to be a pretty big feature of the next four weeks and the play-offs and we're taking a diametrically-opposite approach this year than when we were riding Corey Dillon a few years back. The loss of Sammy Morris as the uphill runner is looking increasingly significant.

The Steelers are a big threat next week, but I still see 15-1 minimum in our future, and without Freeney I'm not massively bothered by the Colts D.

MoLewisrocks 12-04-2007 10:51 AM

Re: Dr Z analysis
 
They were really only over run in the third quarter. But let's not let the facts muddy the mood.

Can someone tell me who the Steelers have only suffered 4 losses to? It will help me grasp why they are so likely to hang a loss on us on the road... Unless you think that loss will come at the hands of the JETS or Doofins, or that team led by the genetically mutant Manning. :rolleyes:

Urgent 12-04-2007 10:55 AM

Re: Dr Z analysis
 
Great teams are not always beaten by great teams.

If you look at the last half dozen teams to start 10-0, the teams that beat them averaged about .500.

Just because the Steelers lost to the Jets doesn't mean that they cannot beat the Patriots, any more than it means that the Jets are better than the Steelers.

VJCPatriot 12-04-2007 11:01 AM

Re: Dr Z analysis
 
Z doesn't tell us anything we didn't already know. The Pats rushing D was terrible last night. Particularly in the 3rd quarter. What is relevant though is the fact they righted the ship in the 4th quarter when it mattered (albeit by stacking 8 to stop the run).

The Pats will need to look hard in the mirror again, then come up with a gameplan against Pitt. Pitt is a team that loves to run the football, and I think Roethlisberger is a better QB than Boller, so it will be a tough matchup.

cstjohn17 12-04-2007 11:03 AM

Re: Dr Z analysis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks (Post 662825)
They were really only over run in the third quarter. But let's not let the facts muddy the mood.

Can someone tell me who the Steelers have only suffered 4 losses to? It will help me grasp why they are so likely to hang a loss on us on the road... Unless you think that loss will come at the hands of the JETS or Doofins, or that team led by the genetically mutant Manning. :rolleyes:

I think most of us expect them to win out but lets not pretend that they can't be beaten. The top teams in the AFC and even the Cowboys have the potential to beat this team.

To shore up the run they had to bring Harrison into the box on almost every play, sooner or later the front seven has to stop the run, we aren't going to see Kyle Boller in the playoffs. What was alarming to me was the ease of the Ravens running attack, run left off tackle, run left off tackle, run left off tackle. The OLB, DE and ILB were completely dominated, it can be fixed but it is late in the year to try to implement fundamentals. Lucky for them they get to play a power running team this week and can look for a little redemption.

Synopsis
  • Jacksonville - Almost same team as the Ravens but bigger and better. They will try the exact same approach, I don't think it is enough to beat the Patriots but with some breaks (turnovers) it could happen.
  • Chargers - Excellent power running team, they ran out of the same formation in last years playoff game with very good success.
  • Colts - More of spread offense, but simply having Manning gives them a shot. Just like having Brady gives the Patriots a shot. At home against a banged up Colts D, I expect the Pats to win.
  • Dallas - Very balanced team, excellent against the run. Very good offense, big offensive and defensive lines, I expect them to hang with the Pats, late INT by the 'gunslinger' Romo seals it for the Pats, then we can finally exhale.

ClevTrev 12-04-2007 11:12 AM

Re: Dr Z analysis
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cstjohn17 (Post 662861)
I think most of us expect them to win out but lets not pretend that they can't be beaten. The top teams in the AFC and even the Cowboys have the potential to beat this team.

Synopsis
  • Jacksonville - Almost same team as the Ravens but bigger and better. They will try the exact same approach, I don't think it is enough to beat the Patriots but with some breaks (turnovers) it could happen.
  • Chargers - Excellent power running team, they ran out of the same formation in last years playoff game with very good success.
  • Colts - More of spread offense, but simply having Manning gives them a shot. Just like having Brady gives the Patriots a shot. At home against a banged up Colts D, I expect the Pats to win.
  • Dallas - Very balanced team, excellent against the run. Very good offense, big offensive and defensive lines, I expect them to hang with the Pats, late INT by the 'gunslinger' Romo seals it for the Pats, then we can finally exhale.

I don't expect them to win out, and I hope I'm wrong. The point that any team regardless of their record can beat the Pats is a good one.

Note that Dallas very likely could now be the toughest team in the NFL. I believe they've reached parity with the top AFC teams.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566