New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Page 1 of 11 1 2345 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Colts want NFL to Explain (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/67284-colts-want-nfl-explain.html)

SVN 11-13-2007 03:38 PM
Colts want NFL to Explain
 
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...O3ibEAodF2A%3D

this is quite funny considering how the pats game was called.

cblesz 11-13-2007 03:44 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Well, they can tune in to Pereirra's segment on NFL network. With his history, I am sure he will say that the officials got it wrong and issue an apology to the Colts.


BAWAHAAAAAA!!!!:) :) :)

PatsChick87 11-13-2007 03:49 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Does this mean that Dungy misinterpreted the rule on simulating snap? It seemed pretty clear to me. Just because he got away with this before(probably because someone jumped offsides) doesn't mean it isn't a penalty!

psychoPat 11-13-2007 03:54 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
It is tempting to laugh such shenanigans off as amusing chutzpah.

But the purpose of this demand for further explanation is not really to find out
what did happen Sunday night.

It is revving up their snarling intimidation engine
... so that officials will get back on program and resume being
as docile and cooperative as they had been at home the week before.

BrianPat 11-13-2007 03:54 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by cblesz (Post 623812)
Well, they can tune in to Pereirra's segment on NFL network. With his history, I am sure he will say that the officials got it wrong and issue an apology to the Colts.


BAWAHAAAAAA!!!!:) :) :)

Now that would be something !!!

cblesz 11-13-2007 03:57 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychoPat (Post 623837)
It is tempting to laugh such shenanigans off as amusing chutzpah.

But the purpose of this demand for further explanation is not really to find out
what did happen Sunday night.

It is revving up their snarling intimidation engine
... so that officials will get back on program and resume being
as docile and cooperative as they had been at home the week before.
That is so freaking true. Of course Polian is screetching now so they look the other way on something else in the future...

DaBruinz 11-13-2007 03:57 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVN (Post 623802)
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...O3ibEAodF2A%3D

this is quite funny considering how the pats game was called.
I always thought that you couldn't have more than one person in motion at any one time. On that play in particular, they had 3 people moving. Utecht moving away from the line. Moorehead (?) moving up. And Fletcher going in motion.

Also, Utecht never came UP out of his stance.. He hopped straight back. I believe that is also not a valid movement. I think if Utecht had come UP out of his stance and then reset, I believe he'd have been fine.

He Ban Me 11-13-2007 04:02 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz (Post 623849)
I always thought that you couldn't have more than one person in motion at any one time. On that play in particular, they had 3 people moving. Utecht moving away from the line. Moorehead (?) moving up. And Fletcher going in motion.

Also, Utecht never came UP out of his stance.. He hopped straight back. I believe that is also not a valid movement. I think if Utecht had come UP out of his stance and then reset, I believe he'd have been fine.
I think you are right, it all centered on Utecht's movement. Too obvious, but Dungy was arguing that it was legal, they had run out of it before. In the end, all around stupid play. Although defenses have screwed that up before, I think they knew there was no way they were going to hike the ball. The problem with the entire thing is that eventually, they were going to have to call a T.O. They should have had enough forethought to realize AV could miss, and that 3 TO's would be crucial in trying to get ball back. Too bad Addai's run didn't come before the 2 minute warning, then no review:D

Pujo 11-13-2007 04:02 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz (Post 623849)
I always thought that you couldn't have more than one person in motion at any one time. On that play in particular, they had 3 people moving. Utecht moving away from the line. Moorehead (?) moving up. And Fletcher going in motion.
You can have multiple players in motion as long as they they pause for at least one second prior to the snap (except one player, who may be in lateral motion at the snap).

Not sure about Utecht as I didn't see that play.

wdkantro2 11-13-2007 04:07 PM
Re: Colts want NFL to Explain
 
Regardless of the team, I hate excuses. The reason they lost wasn't one potentially questionable call. It was their horrendous offensive performance and the failure of their kicker. They still had an EASY chance to win and that's all you can ask for.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.
Page 1 of 11 1 2345 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95