![]() |
The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
Where are the weaknesses? I suppose we could draft an OT if a top prospect were available to push Britt, and perhaps draft a RB (or bring in a jag) to challenge Mills for his spot. And we could use a 3rd QB. But the offense is ready to go, NOW.
OFFENSE (25) QB - 3 Tom Brady, Cassell, OPEN RB - 3 Maroney, Morris, Faulk FB - 1 Evans HB/RB - 1 Mills C - 2 Koppen, Hochstein G - 3 Neal, Mankins, Yates/Mruczkowski OT - 4 Light, Kaczur, O'Callaghan, Britt WR - 5 Stallworth, Washington, Welker, Caldwell, Gaffney TE - 3 Watson, Dave Thomas, Kyle Brady |
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
It's a pretty deep group. I'd like to see a mid round RB picked up who can complement Maroney's running style. Other than that addition, there's not a critical need.
|
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
Quote:
you must like wendys, the only full name you used is dave thomas :singing: :singing: |
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
Quote:
:confused: :p |
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
Quote:
Dave ... Adalius ... Santonio. |
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
As a practical matter,
only three can i foresee even being challenged ... much less beaten out: Evans ... Mruc ... Yates. |
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
This is going to be, not good but a great offense.. I would like to see maybee another RB, and guard help ,but the offense is pretty much set..
|
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
Quote:
Stallworth looks a little like Gabriel, but that will be the only resembelence.. |
Re: The Offense Looks Pretty Solid
Quote:
Maroney hit the rookie wall because of his rib injury. If he stays healthy he'll be productive. I don't know if Stallworth can stay healthy. He's done it a couple of seasons in the past (2004 and 2005) but it's a little bit of a concern. The bottom line is our WR situation is vastly improved over last year. On the whole, the offense is vastly improved. Who cares about pro bowlers. Branch and Givens weren't living in Honululu every year when they were here and we were still winning SBs. I don't buy into the Gabriel comparisons. The Gabriel move was out of desperation and at a time when few options were available. Signing Washington and Stallworth were moves that BB clearly gave thought to. The "not patriots guys" is spin by opposing GMs, coaches and mediots who are mortified that this team is not only not about to fade into the night as they so desperately hoped it would, but re-loaded and ready for more title runs. Plus, the added benefit of these mostly offensive moves means BB can now use the bulk of the draft to load up on D, again really bad news for 31 other teams. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.