![]() |
Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
http://www.jaguars.com/News/Article.aspx?id=5754
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
"He’s not going to the Pro Bowl. What a joke."
Man, I want to play San Diego in the playoffs REAL BAD. |
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
A late edition:
http://www.jaguars.com/News/Article.aspx?id=5761 Quote:
|
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
Quote:
The way I saw it, Garrard had the ball ready to throw, but Jarvis' arm coming down on the strip sack pushed it forward, giving the illusion of the arm moving forward. While the tuck rule does not apply, it is a very similar play to that of January 2001. Brady's arm was pushed foward into his left hand, giving the illusion of a tuck. |
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
Why does everyone seem to forget that to overturn the call on the field there must be IRREFUTABLE visual evidence to the contrary? Not just some angle that seems to show something 'possibly' different. In this instance I saw the game on a 56" HDTV - better than the on-field refs have. The '3rd replay shot to Garrard's right' does NOT give you all the depth information to make an irrefutable decision. I knew that the call would not be overturned, figuring 80-20 in our favor where 20% is a generous allowance for an incompetent or biased ref who just does the wrong thing.
|
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
I thought it was a fumble. The first angle I saw, I said I thought it would be overturned into an incpmplete pass. But the last angle, it looked like the ball moved in (and starting out of) his hand before he tried to throw (regardless of whether Jarvis was the one who moved his arm forward or not).
|
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
Tuck rule, shmuck rule, who the heck cares. The game's over. Same as Denver last year and the PI call and the TD vs. safety. Good teams don't put themselves in a position to let the refs decide.
All that aside, you gotta love Vic's comments. "Players, Skeeter. Always players, not plays." This Jax writer has some serious man love for our Brady and you have to respect that. Thanks for the link, Box. |
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
Quote:
|
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
Quote:
|
Re: Ask Vic with some post Pats @ Jags comments
I almost wrote to Vic but didn't.
Beyond the fumble/tuck rule play is the fact that the Jags put themselves in the position to miss the playoffs because they dropped two games to the moribund Houston Texans and Tennessee's 98 yards of total offense. Whether it was a fumble or not- it was ONE play. To make that big a deal of it cheapens the overall premise when you look at what JAX did to be in a situation where their postseason hopes hinged on one offensive drive against one of the league's best defenses. Vic's a homer, and I got it. But- one fact he can't dispute is that if you put yourself in the position to depend on a replay decision to determine your fate, then you've probably not done enough to get ahead. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.