![]() |
Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
http://tinyurl.com/yaqe5w
Show them the money .....San Francisco owner John York's austerity plan has worked wonders, and the 49ers top the list with $41.78 million to spend. After years of salary-cap hell, the Tennessee Titans are next with $39.9 million under next season's cap. ....There are 20 teams with about $20 million or more to spend if they choose to do so. Here are the rest of the top ten teams: 3. Buffalo $37.86 million, 4. Arizona $35.2 million, 5. Cleveland $31.9 million, 6. Minnesota $31.5 million, 7. Jacksonville $31 million, 8. Cincinnati $28.8 million, 9. Green Bay $28.36 million and 10. New England $$26.98 million. |
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Quote:
My opinion is that extra cap money will be used to structure the cap long term. Not that BB and Pioli have not always taken a long term approach to the cap, but I think this is an opportunity to strengthen that. In other words, there are 2 very different ways to handle having 27mill of cap room. 1 is to buy up everything you can, and backload heavily so you can get a bunch of free agents. Another is to to look at your roster, and your long term needs, then strutcture new deals, or restructure, extend etc players to have a heavier hit early in the deal. We have seen that our success means that when contracts are up, retaining players costs more than it would have projected to years before. I think BB and Pioli react to that, by trying to structure deals that keep future years clean of huge cap increases. Miguel, Do you see that as a feasible plan? Is it realistic that you CAN structure contracts that will be more front loaded? Would that kind of deal be better or worse for the player? |
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
I'd like to see a chart with these numbers along with how many players are signed for the taken money.
|
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Cheap bastards! I won't be satisfied until they go OVER the cap!!!!
;) |
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Quote:
|
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Quote:
|
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Quote:
You can fulfill your wish by going to the NFLPA.org site and do the legwork yourself:) Using data from the RedZone.Org site, here are the number of free agents each team has as of today. 49ers ERFA 1 RFA 3 UFA 9 49ers Total 13 Bears ERFA 1 RFA 3 UFA 7 Bears Total 11 Bengals ERFA 1 RFA 8 UFA 15 Bengals Total 24 Bills ERFA 1 RFA 4 UFA 10 Bills Total 15 Broncos ERFA 1 RFA 1 UFA 8 Broncos Total 10 Browns ERFA 4 RFA 4 UFA 6 Browns Total 14 Buccaneers ERFA 2 RFA 2 UFA 11 Buccaneers Total 15 Cardinals ERFA 6 RFA 4 UFA 14 Cardinals Total 24 Chargers ERFA 6 RFA 5 UFA 5 Chargers Total 16 Chiefs ERFA 2 RFA 6 UFA 8 Chiefs Total 16 Colts ERFA 1 RFA 8 UFA 9 Colts Total 18 Cowboys ERFA 6 RFA 8 UFA 5 Cowboys Total 19 Dolphins ERFA 3 RFA 5 UFA 15 Dolphins Total 23 Eagles ERFA 1 RFA 1 UFA 10 Eagles Total 12 Falcons ERFA 7 RFA 3 UFA 7 Falcons Total 17 Giants ERFA 3 RFA 3 UFA 12 Giants Total 18 Jaguars ERFA 12 RFA 8 UFA 9 Jaguars Total 29 Jets ERFA 1 RFA 5 UFA 3 Jets Total 9 Lions ERFA 3 RFA 5 UFA 12 Lions Total 20 Packers ERFA 4 RFA 1 UFA 8 Packers Total 13 Panthers ERFA 2 RFA 3 UFA 7 Panthers Total 12 Patriots ERFA 5 RFA 3 UFA 13 Patriots Total 21 Raiders ERFA 6 RFA 3 UFA 9 Raiders Total 18 Rams ERFA 1 RFA 6 UFA 13 Rams Total 20 Ravens ERFA 8 RFA 5 UFA 8 Ravens Total 21 Redskins ERFA 5 UFA 10 Redskins Total 15 Saints ERFA 2 RFA 5 UFA 13 Saints Total 20 Seahawks ERFA 2 RFA 6 UFA 14 Seahawks Total 22 Steelers ERFA 3 RFA 1 UFA 6 Steelers Total 10 Texans ERFA 7 RFA 7 UFA 16 Texans Total 30 Titans ERFA 3 RFA 7 UFA 8 Titans Total 18 Vikings ERFA 3 RFA 8 UFA 8 Vikings Total 19 Grand Total 562 |
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Quote:
|
Re: Pats 10th in cap space for the 2007 season
Even though the Pats have alot of UFA (13 I think) really they only have a couple high priced ones, in Graham and Samuel. I wonder how much they'd have to pay Samuel to keep him around. For some reason the Giants were able to sign Sam Madison to a very reasonable contract...I think 3M per year or something. I wonder why we didn't grab him.
Other teams seem to bank on the cap rising over time and thus bailing them out of their troubles, whereas the pats don't seem to. They could easily sign a FA or two and sign Samuel and Graham. But then the next year they'd have Warren (IIRC) and Wilson as well as Caldwell. Also they may be able to cut Dillon's salary somewhat. The skins just signed Ladell betts for 2M a year or something....seems very reasonable compared to Dillon's salary. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.